Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,770
I was really struck by this comment when I first read it:
FKH thinks it unlikely that he was paying money to clients instead of discharging mortgages. I don't think that the Law Society would be suggesting this or getting a freezing order unless there was something seriously wrong.
It makes no sense? This whole case is very odd. From the sounds of it, there is no dishonesty involved - just disorganisation and incoherence. It's quite sad for the solicitor and it's going to be very sad for the purchasers who don't have valid title.
Brendan
I have dealt with a few incoherent people and it really is frustrating.the committee considered Mr Comiskey’s responses to the allegations against him as being “a completely incoherent explanation of events”. He failed to turn up at three subsequent meetings.
FKH thinks it unlikely that he was paying money to clients instead of discharging mortgages. I don't think that the Law Society would be suggesting this or getting a freezing order unless there was something seriously wrong.
It makes no sense? This whole case is very odd. From the sounds of it, there is no dishonesty involved - just disorganisation and incoherence. It's quite sad for the solicitor and it's going to be very sad for the purchasers who don't have valid title.
Brendan