Just because you're renting doesn't mean it's not your home. Can a landlord put a limit on the amount of times you can have someone stay over, how many visitors you can have because it'll affect wear and tear?
reasonable to expect to be allowed to have 1 person per single and 2 people per double room without it adversely affecting wear and tear?
2 double rooms mean it was built to accomodate 4 people and I wouldn't think it unreasonable to put 4 people in there without the landlord being able to up the rent
I suppose the question now is, can a landlord give permission for additional licencees renege on this verbal agreement?
The fact that in this case the property is registered with the PRTB and says that it is suitable for 4 people would mean he has no grounds for denying the extra people here.
Do you have any links to where the law deferenciates between a licencee and a tenant for the purpose of renting accomodation etc. I can't find that term mentioned. All I can find relating to this subject is the following.
Licensees in private rented accommodation are not tenants as there has been no tenancy entered into by them with the landlord. While the tenant is under a statutory obligation to inform the landlord of the identity of any person resident in (rather than just visiting) the dwelling, the landlord will not be in a position to accept or veto the individual concerned in the way that he/she could with a prospective tenant.
I understand tenants can not sub-let without permission from the landlord but the same does not apply for adding licensees. A landlord can not stop someones partner or friend or family from moving in with them. Can you provide a link that says otherwise?Dont have time for a proper reply right now but just to confirm to anyone doubting-
as a tenant you are NOT ALLOWED to licence a room or sub-let a room when you have a signed contract (they didnt yet I know) The legal difference betweern a licencee and sub-letter does not apply as a tenant is not permited to licence a room without the prior knowledge of the landlord.
A licensee residing in a private rented dwelling is living there at the invitation of the tenant as the arrangement enabling a licensee to live in rented accommodation is made with the tenant and not with the landlord.
Probably the best course of action considering the landlords blatant disregard for your rights. Best of luck with the new place.Like I have already stated, he has insisted that if we are to remain in the apartment during the period of notice, we must pay the extra rent. We have decided not to do this and have now subsequently left the apartment. The deposit was returned in full.
I understand tenants can not sub-let without permission from the landlord but the same does not apply for adding licensees. A landlord can not stop someones partner or friend or family from moving in with them. Can you provide a link that says otherwise?
The following comes from the PRTB's Licensee document that I linked to earlier:
I think by their nature they are almost always excluded from the tenancy agreement. If they were on the tenancy agreement they would probably be considered tenants.I wonder can you exclude licencees on the tenancy agreement?
Ah sorry, misread you the first time. I don't see anything to stop a landlord putting a maximum occupancy clause in the lease which would effectively prevent the tenants from bringing in extra people as licensees.I meant can you exclude the tenant from bringing in any licencees' on the tenants rental agreement. Or is the bringing in of licencee's a tenants right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?