Re: Eircom etc
I am getting a bit confused with the different numbers. Was this 2.067 not the value as set the day after Vodaphone takeover, ie. Eircom = 1.11, Vodaphone = 1.45406 total = 2.56406? Should I not be applying these percentages to the actual cost I paid (3.90) not the value in 2001? See CM’s post of 23/11/01 above which gives the nominal cost of Vodaphone share as 4.66?
If the nominal value is 4.66 it will be worth my while selling. If 2.067, I have no loss/small gain depending on indexation so it is not worth my while selling.
Sorry - I was overlooking the fact that
Vodafone takeover shares were
not issued on a one for one basis for
eircell2000 shares so the previous posts on the original
eircom acquisition costs attributable to
Vodafone shares are more accurate than my previous one. Again apologies for that...
I've been through these figures several times myself but still (obviously) get confused about them since the whole
eircom/eircell2000/Vodafone situation was all a bit complicated, particularly for the many novice first time direct share investors who participated. Best to go through the previous posts above in detail (particularly
Brendan's point by point summary post) and double check that you understand how the figures are crunched and what your ultimate loss is.
I did not fill in on my Tax Return that I sold Eircom shares to Valentia – purely never struck me as a sale of shares when filling in the form.
Neither did I because I wasn't (and still amn't) sure that a return to record a loss was necessary. I have since written the loss off against subsequent capital gains and
Revenue have not complained so far. As I said before it's a good idea to err on the site of caution and provide
Revenue with detailed calculations of how you arrive at your various figures.
I notice that CM’s post of 30/11/01 says indexation can’t be used for the takeover. Is that still the case?
Indexation
can be used in a takeover situation but it can't be used
to enhance (increase) a loss so if this is a loss making situation (as I presume it is) then indexation is irrelevant after all. Apologies for any confusion caused.