paper-folder
Registered User
- Messages
- 100
I know of someone looking for work at the moment due to recent redundancy. HSE are recruiting for a particular IT role at the moment (multiple positions available) with the job being advertised and promoted on social media including LinkedIn.
Friend had been working in private sector and is well qualified and experienced enough to apply for the role based on the job spec and qualifications with the exception that the “campaign is confined to staff who are currently employed by the HSE, TUSLA, other statutory health agencies”.
I appreciate that 'current employment' is not one of the nine recognised grounds for discrimination under equality legislation, but this restrictive practice appears to me to be significant and unwarranted discrimination. The job is highly specialised in nature and I imagine the cohort who are eligible to apply on the basis of both their qualifications and current employment will be very small indeed.
Does it seem at least unfair that a public body can dictate eligibility in such a fashion? Is it not poor management practice on their part to restrict candidates in this way and not benefit from the wider pool of talent available in the general work-force?
Has anyone come across similar before and is there any way around it other than to try for a very basic position and wait for an opportunity like this to come up again? Thanks for your thoughts.
Friend had been working in private sector and is well qualified and experienced enough to apply for the role based on the job spec and qualifications with the exception that the “campaign is confined to staff who are currently employed by the HSE, TUSLA, other statutory health agencies”.
I appreciate that 'current employment' is not one of the nine recognised grounds for discrimination under equality legislation, but this restrictive practice appears to me to be significant and unwarranted discrimination. The job is highly specialised in nature and I imagine the cohort who are eligible to apply on the basis of both their qualifications and current employment will be very small indeed.
Does it seem at least unfair that a public body can dictate eligibility in such a fashion? Is it not poor management practice on their part to restrict candidates in this way and not benefit from the wider pool of talent available in the general work-force?
Has anyone come across similar before and is there any way around it other than to try for a very basic position and wait for an opportunity like this to come up again? Thanks for your thoughts.