Hi,
My point is not specifically meant to be an overseas investment question, I was highlighting that example as one where I often see people appear to be advised against such investment straight off the bat, regardless of how much homework and research has been done by the prospective investor.
What I'm trying to get at... I guess, is to challenge what appears to be entrenched views that "Shares are better than property over a significant period of time". It is rolled out as a standard answer.
I accept that probably up until 10 years ago this statement was true.... however I now think that this typical response needs reviewing in light of the last 15 years or so.
I mean, isn't 15 years a significant period of time? It's my whole working life thus far, it's 1/2 to 2/3's of a typical mortgage term, it's 20% of my time on this planet (touch wood).
Do these last 15 years no count for anything, or are they some sort of blip?
Ireland in the early 1980's was nearly bankrupt, look at the place now.... is it not possible that Eastern Europe (or Timbuctou) can follow a similar path for the next 20 years.... afterall our economy is very dependent on overseas investment, so what's to stop the multi-national investment moving to Eastern Europe and cheaper overheads.... and giving them 20 years of incredible growth the same as we had?