Lots of people lived within their means during the boom. I for one am sick and tired of hearing from the media and politicians bankers etc. that we all lived beyond our means and now we all have to pay. But why should those who lived within their means be asked now to bail out those who lived beyond their means. Those who expect to be bailed out are often expecting to hold on to their assets and lifestyle etc.
Billo
well said Billo. I lived within by means as did 90% of the people I know in my immediate circle. Yes, those of us who bought houses are in negative equity, and some by large amounts, but none of these people lived the high life during the so called boom...no fancy holidays or apt's purchased abroad, no 5 series beamers, no designer kitchens
(I do know some people also who did go mad and spent,spent, spent).
But there are a lot of people out there, and a few on here who've discovered AAM lately, who want everyone to get debt forgiveness (and hold on to their houses) including:
- the landlord with several BTL's
- the spend spend spend folk who bought the big houses, way beyond their means
- the cute hoors who've been collecting rent and not paying their mortgage
And I'm supposed to feel bad about not wanting debt forgiveness for everyone...no chance.
Yes, there are genuine people in serious trouble out there. They would be much better off in a lot of cases giving up their houses under a new bankruptcy scheme and starting again by renting etc, rather than trying to pay mortgages that will be beyond their means for years on end. These people need help and should be helped.
(A probation period after declaring bankruptcy such as 3 or 5 years in which you could'nt get a mortgage again...this would help keep the opportunists away from trying to avoid debts they can still afford)