Dunno why Revenue should care; it’s their job to collect what they’re told to collect. It’s not like they get to keep it.So Revenue would lose the benefit of the taxes paid at 41% - I can't see that going down well with them
I've shown a few times on AAM that the extra revenue the 41% brings in, is minimal, and that the foregone gains for the punter are >20x the extra tax. This is borne out by revenues own figures which show CGT taxes have grown massively since the introduction of Exit tax, while Exit tax has comparatively shrunk.So Revenue would lose the benefit of the taxes paid at 41% - I can't see that going down well with them
I've shown a few times on AAM that the extra revenue the 41% brings in, is minimal,
To te best of my knowledge there is no total figure available from Revenue for exit tax i.e. the one that includes exit tax on self-assessed ETFs. What Revenue publish under their receipts by taxhead is Life Assurance Exit Tax only.
So why do they not publicly disclose the figures?So yes, they have a breakdown of the taxes declared and paid
Furthermore, these receipts do not include tax paid through self-assessed returns (i.e. in respect of Irish domiciled ETFs; investments in EU/EEA/OECD equivalent offshore funds; and foreign life policies) as this data is not available.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?