blackthorn
Registered User
- Messages
- 12
ClubMan - so have I and I believe that guy in the Revenue is wrong also.
I believe the relevant section of the Tax Consolidations Act is Part 30 section 780 (Notes for Guidance: [broken link removed]) which states:
"780 Charge to income tax on repayment of employee’s contributions
This section imposes a general charge to tax, at the standard rate in force at the time of payment, on the repayment of any contributions to an employee during his/her lifetime.
...
The refunded contribution is not to be regarded as income for any other purpose of the Income Tax Acts."
Note the "standard rate in force at the time of payment" is 20%.
CapitalCCC - I should clarify that the employer would only pay 3% if I paid 3%, but I opted to pay 10%. I can see how it should therefore be 3% Employee + 7% AVC. However, I still don't think this should impact the tax situation.
I believe the relevant section of the Tax Consolidations Act is Part 30 section 780 (Notes for Guidance: [broken link removed]) which states:
"780 Charge to income tax on repayment of employee’s contributions
This section imposes a general charge to tax, at the standard rate in force at the time of payment, on the repayment of any contributions to an employee during his/her lifetime.
...
The refunded contribution is not to be regarded as income for any other purpose of the Income Tax Acts."
Note the "standard rate in force at the time of payment" is 20%.
CapitalCCC - I should clarify that the employer would only pay 3% if I paid 3%, but I opted to pay 10%. I can see how it should therefore be 3% Employee + 7% AVC. However, I still don't think this should impact the tax situation.