Askar, that is good point, similar to the one Naseem Talib makes on page 165 of ‘Fooled by Randomness’. Siegel’s research AKAIK relates to US equities. But, e.g. ABN Amro’s ‘Global Investment Returns Survey 2008’ says that: “An investment in UK equities of £100 at the start of 1900 would, with dividends reinvested, have grown to over £2.2 million by the end of 2007, a return of 9.7% p.a.” and that “. . . since 1900, equities are the best-performing asset class in every [developed market] country” This is the same conclusion as Siegel’s that equities (at least in developed markets, which make up 85% of world market cap) are the best performing asset class in the long run. So, unless global markets are about to change significantly in the future, it would be prudent to remain invested in equities for the long run and not cash in. (But the long run could be a very long time.) However, that is not to say that remaining in an IE managed fund of the type discussed in this forum does not carry certain non-market risks. For example, if the fund manager was unable to safeguard the value of your investment when markets fell, does he / she have the ability to recoup your loss when / if it recovers; and (b) will poor initial allocations and / or high management fees significantly reduce the recovery of your investment?
I think the answer to those questions is probably a resounding 'no'. With a 97% allocation and I would imagine hefty management fees in the order of 2.5% or more (no info given on this, but there will be management fees), it is clear that the markets need to increase over 5.5% p.a. just for OP to maintain nominal value of each year of invested monies i.e it is possible that for every €100 invested, fees take up €5.50, so only €94.50 of the €100 euro is invested. If you include inflation (say 2%) that would require 7.5% return from these markets each year just to maintain existing value of the investment. So I am guessing that OP would only be likely to be making return from the investments if and when they start delivering over 7.5% p.a. - which I cannot foresee as likely. This does not take into account the initial losses from lump sum and contributions already invested which is continuing - and presumably attracting annual management fees (2.5% or so?).