I suppose it really just comes down to whether you are a person of integrity or not. If you’re not then dispose of your assets and live off your neighbours. If you are then don’t.like most I can see both sides.
You do get fewer benefits throughout your life if you aren’t unemployed, disabled etc. And that continues.
However what galls is that two families with the same income, pay the same taxes etc… one spends and the other saves and the saver ends up paying for long term care.
But of course it’s about need. And we can’t predict what we will need in old age. Getting rid of savings and property to avail of state support makes financial sense it seems in this case.
But it seems morally wrong to me and I’m not sure why, maybe it’s jealousy as my parents would not dream of doing that. So if needed the fair deal will take a chunk of their estate.
They were savers all their lives and have a substantial bank account. Currently it’s being spent on care to keep them in their own home, long may that continue. Their kids aren’t in need, their grandkids.., well yes of course.., the 20/30 year olds could really use a hand but they aren’t going to get it.
I wish my parents had travelled more, treated themselves to better cars, got the house fixed up more often, eaten out more etc. But they didn’t and as a result they have money for home help and nursing homes if needed.
I like to be able to look myself in the eyes and know that I am at least trying to set an example for my children.
I understand resentment of those who live off the system but the solution is not to lower yourself to their level. And that’s exactly what is being proposed in this thread.
Last edited: