Is a 1.4% annual management charge competive for lump sum investment?

MarketsSurfer

New Member
Messages
3
Hello. New here. I have a lump sum of about €150K to invest. A financial advisor that I discussed this with recently is recommending an equity-based/multi-assets funds from an insurance company. It comes with annual charges of 1.4% and includes a management charge for the advisor. Could I do better than this?

I'm in my early 50s, so a globally diversified passive index fund with an investment horizon of least 5-10 years or even longer would probably suit what I'm looking for. I'm maxing out my pension contributions already so looking for something else.

I would like to consider other options such as an ETF with an online broker before I decide. Feel free to point towards other threads here that discussed this previously. I had a browse but couldn't easily find what I was looking for.

Thanks.
 
It's good that you realised that the management charge is a very important factor in deciding what fund to invest in.
As the previous replies say, you should do better than 1.4%.
 
Appreciate the responses here. Its given me reason to pause and weigh up all my options. I was doing some of my own research over the last week. I already have an N26 nank account for last few years but I see relatively recently there is now a facility to make investments. I haven't availed of this to date but I see there are many ETFs available and from the ones I looked at the fees can range from anything from 0.2% and up. Any concerns going down this path?

I'm really only looking to invest in a passive index fund and let it be. I don't feel I need an advisory service for this lump sum. Most of my pensions are in managed funds, but I have one in a passive index funds that has much lower fees yet has outperformed the others significantly which I is why I want to at least consider other options beyond what has been proposed to me. Thanks again.
 
Most of my pensions are in managed funds, but I have one in a passive index funds that has much lower fees yet has outperformed the others significantly which I is why I want to at least consider other options beyond what has been proposed to me

Any chance you could tell us the names of the funds (and costs) that you're comparing here?
 
Back
Top