Understand what? Either you can afford to get expensive dental work or you can't.
You have completely missed my point.
Expensive dental treatment will FAIL in certain mouths with ACTIVE disease.
A building analogy............
A bridge is being built accross a river.
This is the same situation as in the mouth with the space being the river and the two teeth either side being the respective banks.
Assume the banks are bog (ie no support or foundations)...........what will happen the bridge? It will fail............same thing in the mouth...........if not sufficient bone support on the teeth either side the bridge or implant will fail especially in the presence of untreated gum disease.
Then someone may say if a bridge/implant does not have a good outlook what about a denture? Invariably dentures make untreated gum disease worse and increase the risk of new cavities.
Conclusion
In the presence of active/untreated disease no treatment is better than expensive replacements which are doomed to fail.
Moral of Story
I have seen numerous cases of untreated gum disease/tooth decay arriving back from abroad with expensive replacements which will fail. Therefore one must get active gum disease etc treated before bridges/implants. 2 weeks is not a time frame to do so.
There is a big difference between scaremongering and good basic science.
I am not devoting my time as a frequent poster here to defend my profession as they are well able to represent themselves!
I have seen horrific cases coming from abroad and this needs to be highlighted.
If I achieve anything on this thread I hope the least I achieve is that patients at least get a SECOND opinion.
If I don't achieve this, all I hope is that these horrific cases do not come to my door as believe me there is nothing worse to tell someone that this is the case and that the remedial costs are multiples of what they have paid.