Z
Z100
Guest
Ulster Rugby has a Northern unionist tradition.
That’s certainly true, and it’s a tradition that, rightly or wrongly, Ulster rugby has guarded over the years, with no attempt ever made to dilute its British/Unionist image, in terms of flags and anthems, so it might attract players and supporters from the ‘other’ side. In that sense Ulster rugby is as guilty as the GAA in the north for emphasising the divisions between the two communities, rather than trying to lessen them.
Do you think it's fair to expect them to stand for Amhran na Bfhiann alone?
Personally yes, but I have no major objection to a second song being played if it keeps Ulster Unionism happy The ones I feel sorry for are the opposition, how painful must it be to have to stand through your opponents’ two anthems!
I think it is to their credit that they stand for it at all.
Why is it a credit to them? I think the real credit goes to the southern authorities who decided to play a second anthem to appease Ulster Unionism, rather than sticking to the line ‘if you play for Ireland you stand for the Irish anthem and no other’. Do they play a second song at Ravenhill, apart from God Save the Queen, at cup finals, etc in an attempt to appease and attract people from the ‘other’ tradition? No.
Would those from Leinster and Munster stand for God save the queen? I don't think so.
Why would Leinster and Munster (and Connacht – they play rugby too, sort of) ever have to stand for God Save the Queen. They’re Irish.