C
cerberus
Guest
excellent reference
thx c
thx c
I don't get you there YD. Do you mean that the anti Bush camp are pro OBL? That's a bit far fetched even for you.However, one thing is for sure, the result will have gutted the OBL fan club from Palestine to Pakistan and here on AAM and the man they have to blame is their hero.
I agree that his rational was to get GWB re-elected but more than just encouraging new AQ recruits his aim is to establish international fault lines between the Muslim and Christian worlds and then widen them into a world wide conflict. He knows that GWB's actions in Iraq and elsewhere help to polarize moderate Muslims and only when the hoped for ground swell takes place can his true aims come to pass. He sees the dominance of the west over the Islamic world in economic, military and popular cultural terms and he seeks to turn the tables and he will kill as many thousand, or tens thousands or millions of people as he has to to get what he wants. A key player and important tool in his plan is GWB. That's why he will be a happy man tonight.Asimov suggested in that thread that this might be OBL's Machiavellian objective (to encourage AQ recruits), and that may indeed be so.
Good one, I must remember that.I wanted the pro abortion Catholic to win
I can't go with that Marie. While I accept the thrust of your post I think you thrust too far (no dirty remarks please, you know what I mean!).Bush has been re-elected as he is every bit as "fundamentalist" as Al Quaida
I reckon, by extrapolation of course, that topside there has been 500 collateral casualties in the Iraqi campaign.
I read that the h-bomb testing in the pacific in the 50's, 60's and 70's have killed about 55 million people (cancer, birth defects etc). The French and British etc knew all about the dangers of fallout at the time. It was in a CND leaflet years ago.How do you calculate how many birth defects as a direct result of Depleted Uranium that there are going to be?
100,000 dead? A bit fishy to me.
[broken link removed]