Strongly disagree. I had occasion to drive a 2022 Tiguan for a few days and found it to be enormous and impractical in the city: hard to park, cumbersome on narrow roads and just generally pointlessly large. The US is not a relevant term of comparison as it's a clear outlier when it comes to vehicle size.Unless you are talking about the full size Range Rover then SUV's are not big cars.
All relative Banjo depends what you normally driveStrongly disagree. I had occasion to drive a 2022 Tiguan for a few days and found it to be enormous and impractical in the city: hard to park, cumbersome on narrow roads and just generally pointlessly large. The US is not a relevant term of comparison as it's a clear outlier when it comes to vehicle size.
Why should there be any incentives for private cars in cities? All incentives should be to move people away from cars towards active travel and public transport.Gross vehicle weight could be a starting point for identifying the "city car" classes, with these getting free municipal parking, free city electric charging, discounted toll fees, use of bus lanes during peak traffic times, specialist shorter parking spaces allowing for greater density of cars/km of street space, etc. Brilliant
I guess because the limitations of our public transport system cannot be solved quickly. The options to me would seem to be -Why should there be any incentives for private cars in cities? All incentives should be to move people away from cars towards active travel and public transport.
There's a climate crisis and an obesity problem. We've problems with air quality in our cities. The last thing we need is more incentives for cars.
Hopefully that won't worsen road safety risks. https://www.iihs.org/topics/vehicle-size-and-weight#:~:text=A bigger, heavier vehicle provides,better protection in frontal crashes.
I'd agree. It would be a mistake ever to give private cars any further use of bus lanes. Even small numbers of them would only slow down a service already severely hampered by drivers who can't stay out of yellow boxes.We've problems with air quality in our cities. The last thing we need is more incentives for cars.
Is there a connection between these two statements, assuming for the moment that they're true? They seem to contradict each other. If pedestrians and cyclists are less safe, their death/injury figures should be rising rather than falling?you're safer in a bigger heavier vehicle, sure. Everyone outside that vehicle is less safe though. Death/injury figures for car occupants have plummeted (for a variety of reasons, not just car size) but they haven't dropped to the same extent for pedestrians and cyclists.
And I would imagine for instance that cars have on average been getting lighter rather than heavier in recent times?
Massive assumption there I would have thought.I don't have figures to hand, but if people who used to drive saloons are mostly driving SUVs now (which is clear, some manufacturers don't even make saloons or small cars anymore) I'm not sure how they'd be getting lighter on average.
Maybe true compared to 50 years ago (1970s Morris Minors and Beetles were famously light and infamously dangerous for occupants), arguable at best for 30 years ago, (early 90s Nissans, Toyotas etc were the opposite) but definitely untrue compared to 15-20 years ago. My own car is considerably lighter than its mid-2000s same-make-and-model predecessor.Even cars of the same size are likely to be heavier than they were 30 years ago as they're carrying more equipment.
Unfortunately option 3 doesn't solve the current traffic problems. And those problems are only getting worse if we're building 20k new homes per year. It doesn't help the obesity problem either. And it probably won't help us meet our climate change targets.I guess because the limitations of our public transport system cannot be solved quickly. The options to me would seem to be -
Based on past performance I don't see how 3 is not the way Ireland will go, and if it does why not drive down those personal transport emissions ASAP? There is no option 4 where our public transport system is improved in 3-5 years and the air pollution problems of fossil fuel cars in cities doesn't need to be addressed.
- Aggressively invest in public transport and in ~50 years have something to rival London that takes a significant number of people off the roads + continue suffering the consequences of fossil fuel burning cars in cities for two more generations until the subway is here
- Aggressively invest in public transport and in ~50 years have something to rival London that takes a significant number of people off the roads + electrify personal transport to reduce NOx/SOx/PM/noise pollution by ~100% in cities so the very next generation can have clean air in cities
- Meagrely invest in public transport + electrify personal transport to reduce NOx/SOx/PM/noise pollution by ~100% in cities so the very next generation can have clean air in cities
Thanks and if someone runs with some of it, maybe I won't have to hold my breath next time I'm in an urban environment, although I could wear two or three of my now (allegedly) redundant COVID masks.Nice idea but won't hold my breath Mathepac.
Totally agree with all that. To be clear option 3 is not a great option, I’m just making the point that it’s better than option 1 and regrettably the most likely Ireland will take. Nothing in Ireland’s economic or political landscape suggests we’re within 50+ years of even a mediocre public transport infrastructure.Unfortunately option 3 doesn't solve the current traffic problems. And those problems are only getting worse if we're building 20k new homes per year. It doesn't help the obesity problem either. And it probably won't help us meet our climate change targets.
And something that is overlooked is the reduction in quality of life due to car dependency. How much better would our lives be if we didn't drive as much and had more livable cities.
EV's are heavier so yes will be harder on tyres. although one step at a timeThanks and if someone runs with some of it, maybe I won't have to hold my breath next time I'm in an urban environment, although I could wear two or three of my now (allegedly) redundant COVID masks.
Has anyone tackled the problem of tyre particulate pollution? Are EVs worse offenders than ICEVs in this respect?
Feel free to start your own threads on the climate and obesity crises and city air quality. This thread is about an "Interesting look at how green EV actually is".There's a climate crisis and an obesity problem. We've problems with air quality in our cities. The last thing we need is more incentives for cars.
I responded to your comment suggesting incentives for cars in cities. They're related topics. You could respond to that if you want. Or not.Feel free to start your own threads on the climate and obesity crises and city air quality. This thread is about an "Interesting look at how green EV actually is".
EVs are 2 ton with their batteries taking up half the weightalso (apart from the obvious benefits of getting people to use alternative options for short journeys in particular); not enough is being done to encourage smaller vehicles. How much of the benefit of electrification is being lost if people are still tooling around on their own in 2-tonne SUVs (even worse if the trend for pick-up trucks follows over from the US as well). You don't need 2 tonnes of metal and batteries to go buy a litre of milk. There should be a higher relative subsidy for smaller EVs.