yes not many people understand that but if every barrel of oil is refined into its different grades anyway and that doesn't change, why would the refining costs of diesel. petrol gasoline be different and variable ? Surely the cost of refining should go up and down equally between diesel and petrol etc because when you refine diesel you also get petrol gasoline etc.Gasoline has not been hit as badly as far less of it came from Russia, but keep in mind when you refine different products from crude you can change the ratios slightly but you can’t just say I want loads of diesel and no Gasoilne,
This article explains it better than I can. Supply and demand is a huge factor for refineries margins.yes not many people understand that but if every barrel of oil is refined into its different grades anyway and that doesn't change, why would the refining costs of diesel. petrol gasoline be different and variable ? Surely the cost of refining should go up and down equally between diesel and petrol etc because when you refine diesel you also get petrol gasoline etc.
It also shows how stupid the policy of encouraging the purchase of diesel cars over petrol was back in 2008. Traditionally light passenger vehicles were always powered by petrol and heavy trucks, commercial vehicles and agricultural equipment by diesel, therefore there was always a stable equilibrium. Another factor with passenger vehicles getting diesel engines is that it allowed these vehicles get much bigger and now the proliferation of SUVs that consume alot of fuel and are too big for parking spaces
There's an inverted Bond yield curve in the US. The biggest since 1981.
In my opinion that shows:
- The market thinks interest rates will increase more in the short term. That is a reaction to US economy is still adding jobs, showing that inflation is still not under control.
The inverted bond curve is a sign that the market thinks there's going to be a recession and so there is a flight to safe investments. That means that interest rates will fall in the longer term (the next year or so) but in the short term they will increase due to the need to counter the inflation caused by QE.I don't get this. I would have said the opposite !
The inverted yield curve results from investors piling in to long dated bonds thus driving down long range yields. They do this to lock in returns because they expect short term rates to fall.
The inverted bond curve is a sign that the market thinks there's going to be a recession and so there is a flight to safe investments. That means that interest rates will fall in the longer term (the next year or so) but in the short term they will increase due to the need to counter the inflation caused by QE.
Not the interest rates on bonds, central bank rates. Sorry, my post was badly worded and totally confusing.If the expectation were for short term interest rates to rise then investors would wait and buy the short dated bonds to get the higher returns !
I think Philip Lane's influence on the ECB is well and truly gone, fighting inflation and raising interest rate is now the predominant policy. The ECB was too late in starting to raise rates and they need to watch the exchange rate with the dollar which is now going in the right direction and a key reason why fuel prices have dropped lately. The ultra low interest rates were a key factor in stoking inflation and getting it burning againThe premise of the thread was that some in the ECB, and particularly Philip Lane, may persuade other members to hold back on going too high on interest rates to allow for the current increases to take effect and also take note that input costs will start dropping.
Some financial commentators are now suggesting that there will be just one further 0.5% rate hike before the ECB takes a pause.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?