David_Dublin
Registered User
- Messages
- 859
Isn't their defence in a lot of scenarios that there was no tracker available and that if there was the rate would have been much higher than the prevailing standard variable rate. Or maybe I am focussing on my own scenario, whereby my 3 year fixed term expired and defaulted onto standard variable and I was not offered a tracker.I would use plain English, just outline the facts and how it affected you financially etc. This all happened at a time when people were hit by the recession and WOULD have taken up the tracker option as it was much lower than the variable at the time. Its just not right that a certain group of mortgage holders were penalised in order for the financial institutions to gain from it.