My dissatisfaction, no, revulsion, at the waste and cronyism in our society is why I am not paying the charge. It is my means of protest.
I find your comment extremely insulting. Taxation is my job and I take a very strict line on submitting accurate returns. I believe in the necessity of taxes. If you collect VAT and PAYE, etc, not passing it to Revenue is theft In my book. If you make profits, you pay your tax. To suggest that people who take issue with this charge are the type of people who regularly evade taxes and make false welfare claims is a jump to far.
Isnt it more likely that income tax and vat paid into the general taxation pool has a much greater chance of being 'squandered' than a tax that is ring fenced for a particular purpose? Using this logic, you would think dissenters would pay the household charge and not pay other types of taxation.
Council tenant just like all other tenants are not liable to pay this property tax because they dont own the property they live in.
I agree that it is not fair that the Council as landlord is exempt while competing* private sector landlords have to pay the property tax.
I imagine that this exemption will be challenged in the same way as the VAT exemption was for public car parks competing with private car parks.
Sounds like we need a thread entitled:
I am paying the Household Charge because...
-Other countries have a lot higher property tax i.e. in the UK, how is this any different. The UK VAT rate is nearly as high as Ireland but they also have much higher council tax, however the effective tax rate for a PAYE employeee is roughly the same!
Questions for those who cite living in an estate that is not taken into charge:
Why should I, as a taxpayer, pay because some developer left a private housing estate without proper infrastructure? Why should I pay for this mistake? If the estate has been handed over to a 'management company', why should I pay because a private management company is ineffective at doing its job or is underfunded? Surely it goes without saying that all housing estates should be finished before they are handed over to a council? Its not for the council to do the developers job. If they are not finished, then surely this is something between the occupiers and the developer/management company? I as a citizen who's always paid my way do not want to pay for those who have not fulfilled their obligations. I've already bailed out enough dodgy property via my tax contributions/NAMA.
I don't see why people who live in housing estates have an issue with paying for services that are "paid for "twice".
My point is that services outside of where we actually live are provided or should be provided by the Local Authority and should be paid for by those who live in the broader community.
Parks
Libraries
Playgrounds
Street lighting
Road maintenance
Salting roads in icy weather
Clean up weeks
Organized art week
Bycicle lanes
I'm sure to have not included a pile of stuff.
Marion
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?