How long before nation states buy bitcoin?

Status
Not open for further replies.
@tecate @DazedInPontoon I fully accept that my one off "emergency" is in a different league to receiving regular remittances. But I would pause before calling WU "slime". Similarly I wouldn't castigate all pawnbrokers as slime. The former provide transfer facilities, the latter provide credit facilities to a certain constituency not serviced by mainstream banking and it costs a lot more proportionately, because the efforts and the risks are that much more proportionately.
Of course I would see anything that transforms this dynamic as being a good thing. If bitcoin had intrinsic and stable value it would solve the first for sure. It has neither and this initiative/stunt of Bukele has a huge potential to backfire on the poor people of El Sal.
 
Dublinbay12 said:
A separate question, I assume the price of goods will be higher in EL Salvador when bought with BTC vs $ to account for the spread built into BTC to account for price risk?
Click to expand...
There is of course a spread in every FX pair. Whether that spread translates to an increase in retail prices depends on what is the unit of account. In simple terms the unit of account is the measure by which all transactions are measured. It is usually the local legal tender. El Sal will have three legal tenders but I would presume that the US$ will remain the unit of account and so, yes there should be a spread built into BTC retail prices. That will reverse if BTC ever becomes the unit of account. There would be no spread in colon retail prices as the 2:1 conversion to US$ is fixed.
 
Use whatever nomenclature you're comfortable with, Duke. At the end of the day, the important item is a 10% slippage for people who can least afford it - making transfers on an ongoing basis. That's a significant loss for them personally and a significant loss for the country as a whole.

I don't see a major potential to backfire. This is a significant move - but most likely it will be a slow burner given that they're starting from standstill. Furthermore, on the risk that you perceive to exist with btc, nobody has to expose themselves to it - if they don't want.
For accounting purposes, everything will be represented in USD. In terms of slippage on the conversion, we will have to see. However, the President has stated that the objective here is not to make any sort of profit on this - simply to act as a market maker to facilitate the conversion and make the system work.
 
tecate said:
However, the President has stated that the objective here is not to make any sort of profit on this - simply to act as a market maker to facilitate the conversion and make the system work.
Click to expand...
Well yes, if the government guarantees that there is no spread as it does in the colon/US$ exchange rate then there will be no difference in retail prices based on the denomination of the legal tender being used. That is going to be one heck of a guarantee to administer.
 
Dublinbay12 said:
there are a number of FinTech competitors closing the gap making it much more affordable (transferwise, worldfirst etc).
Click to expand...
Do they support El Salvador, and if so what are the fees like? You can consider Strike one of these competitors.

Dublinbay12 said:
So I assume the rhetoric on WU relates to workers in the US that are likely to be illegal workers earning cash in hand? ...
Click to expand...
I wasn't assuming this.
You might be right if indeed there are a significant number who have no other option of how to get BTC. For others assuming they can use the strike app, the founder is working under the assumption that fees will trend towards zero.
Dublinbay12 said:
A separate question, I assume the price of goods will be higher in EL Salvador when bought with BTC vs $ to account for the spread built into BTC to account for price risk?
Click to expand...
I assume it will be seamless in the app, whether you're paying from a USD stablecoin balance or BTC balance the payment amount would be the same to the recipient either way.
 
It's interesting to note some lightning network statistics now (source). Might be interesting to revisit them in the future and see whether it has grown or not:

Total Capacity: 1,465.74 BTC
Capacity Value: $51.8M
Total Nodes: 11,817
Total Channels: 49,003
 
DazedInPontoon said:
Do they support El Salvador, and if so what are the fees like? You can consider Strike one of these competitors.
Click to expand...
El Salvadors currency is the USD so the issue is just international transfer costs, whether local banks accept international transfers rather than costs associated with converting currency.

Could you not either post the money home from the US or use a pre-loaded debit card in El Salvador given it is the same currency?


DazedInPontoon said:
I wasn't assuming this.
Click to expand...
Who are the users forced to use WU that you referred to?
 
I don't have a legitimate answer about how easy it is to send money from the US to El Salvadaor, I'm taking Jack Maller's word for it when he says it's difficult. Difficult enough that he went to live in El Salvador for 3 months because he saw it as the best example of where Strike would be of benefit.

Do you know for sure there are cheap, quick ways of moving money from the US to there or are you just assuming?
 

We are diverging from the point that EL Salvador accepting Bitcoin doesn't solve the problem of people who are forced to use WU as suggested by Tecate earlier. If anything BTC adoption in this case supports the continued mistreatment of millions of workers in places like the US.

I don't know, but I was querying that if the currency in EL Salvador is USD then the only blockage is how to get USD into the country rather than also exchange rate risk.
 
Following on from El Salvador's move re. bitcoin - other central american countries are taking notice. Here's the front page of a mainstream national newspaper in Costa Rica:

 
Crypto is currently banned in Tanzania - but the President is now looking to reverse that ban and has instructed the Central Bank to look at ways to engage positively with digital currency. In Paraguay a bill is being put forward next month - which its believed will seek to make bitcoin legal tender in the country.

Meanwhile, in El Salvador, the government are making $30 in bitcoin available to every adult in the country to help them become accustomed to the use of the digital wallet that is being developed.
Additionally, Athena plans to install 1500 Bitcoin ATMs in El Salvador.
 
Last edited:
Front-runner in the New York Mayoral race, Eric Adams, had this to say

"“I’m going to promise you in one year … you’re going to see a different city,” said Adams. “We’re going to become the center of life science, the center of cybersecurity, the center of self driving cars, drones, the center of bitcoins.”

Just election sloganeering of course so I take it with a pinch of salt. But it is indicative of the increasing mainstream acceptance of bitcoin.
 

$30 is not great when fees can hit $60+. Given the average GDP of EL Salvador residents is $4,000 per annum, anything other than extremely cheap transactions is too expensive for them. For this to be any kind of success it requires the rollout of the lightning network.

Interestingly given that BTC fees can be bid up during periods of volatility to allow those who want to sell or buy get their transactions to the front of the line. This pits the relatively poor El Salvadorians against those with large holdings or deep pockets (Wall Street Institutional Investors).

 

With the mainstream adoption of Bitcoin, why is it still so volatile? P.s Bitcoin has long been accepted in NYC
 
Dublinbay12 said:
With the mainstream adoption of Bitcoin, why is it still so volatile? P.s Bitcoin has long been accepted in NYC
Click to expand...

I said it was indicative of increasing mainstream acceptance.

I never said it had mainstream acceptance.
It was just an expression of an opinion based on an observation.
 
WolfeTone said:
I said it was indicative of increasing mainstream acceptance.

I never said it had mainstream acceptance.
It was just an expression of an opinion based on an observation.
Click to expand...
Quite right. This thing is still early doors - adoption is only getting started. Plot it on an adoption curve and it's right at the beginning.
 
WolfeTone said:
I said it was indicative of increasing mainstream acceptance.

I never said it had mainstream acceptance.
It was just an expression of an opinion based on an observation.
Click to expand...

BTC is as accepted in NYC today as it was 4 years ago, they pioneered the acceptance of Crypto companies through the BitLicense. New York has always been crypto-friendly. I remember using BTC ATM machines in the Lower East Side back in 2017.

So why is BTC still so volatile?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register