ivorystraws said:
I'm sure drop-d will echo my sentiments here.
Pretty much,
I used to post a lot here a few years ago unedr a different name, it was the best place for advise.
So i need advice and come back and, pretty much get ridiculed......by an admin no less!
But thankfully other people here do in fact "answer about money".
back to web 2.0, dunno if u got it from the same spot but i am fairly familiar with oriellys site
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html same progression as you showed.
My take on w2 is that the information on the site may be the same but the orientation of the site owners have changed....
(in very crude terms)
i consider hotpress web1.0 they have a product (music articles) and charge users for that. they generate about 1 million visits per month
Their orientation is mainly getting visitors to buy their product/service (music articles)
If hot press were to embrace web2.0 they would distribute their articles + article database freely, and presumably get about 10 million visits per month. with web 2.0 their orientation would change in that NOW thier product service is the traffic that comes to their site (a generated market) and this product/service would be sold, not to the visitors, but to third party companies seeking to tap into hotpress's unique market of 10 million visitors...
like web 1.0 looked at visits web 2.0 looks at pay per click (advertising and product placement.
Those this make sense??
My point is that the rules of supply and demand are both there in terms of sell product to consumer but instead of the readers being the consumer buying "intellectual property" (written articles) the consumer is now a third party company buying advertising to a specific market.
Sorry, but thats what i meant by intellectual services. i.e. generating revenue by distributing those services means generating decent content people like to come to your site to see, and in terms charging other companies to advertise, in whatever shape to your created market!
a big one for me is ..heinekin or the like, and the bigger the market i create the bigger amount i can charge.
but considering i dont have much time to chase up these third party companies, most ad placement services require you to "buy in" to their product~investment up front.
At the moment i get about 30,000 views p/m, i will need to see that break 200,000 to be really intresting to the main players..i think
but on your point, i have a cafe press account, it didnt prove very effective, and i have a few partner site, and more in negotiation.
selling advertising space, proved not too successful for me however, again i think i need to improve the quality of my articles on my site and increase the traffic first b4 retrying.
hope this clears my earlier post a bit!