jonathan222
Registered User
- Messages
- 3
Hello all,
A bit of a doozy here and looking for any previous similar experiences or advice.
My wife has a house, in her name, bought after we were married where her mother is named on the mortgage also. Wife pays the mortgage with no involvment from her mother.We lived in house for approx 3 years, as our PPR, and then due to family circumstances, we bought elsewhere and now rent out the house to a married couple. She was on an interest only(tracker) for a number of years and recently the bank have approched her to say that it's time to start paying the capital and Int back. We can't afford to do that (i.e. the full amount) at the moment so have started the standard financial statement (SFS) process. She has never missed a payment so far.
The bank are now saying that as my wife is named on another mortgage contract, she's changed the terms and conditions of the contract and it's not her PPR anymore, however having had a look in the contract it does not mention that the mortgage will be used only for a PPR specifically. It does state "family home" (once and unrelated to the conditions of the mortgage) but under the Family home protection act, the definition can be interpretted different ways. We are not unwilling to keep paying, but the bank just seem to want to get her off her tracker as a priority, and believe they are not listening to us and what we can afford to pay. In fact we've stated we could pay more in two years, once current set expenditure reduces, but the bank is also asking her mother to fill out an SFS now and also looking for details from me and to fill a form out also (again I have no contractual link to the mortgage, so I wonder are they chancing thier arm here and asking?).
I thought the purpose of the SFS and MARP was to work with buyers in difficulties(again not one payment has been missed to date by my wife) and find the tone and approach of the bank to be quite agressive.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
A bit of a doozy here and looking for any previous similar experiences or advice.
My wife has a house, in her name, bought after we were married where her mother is named on the mortgage also. Wife pays the mortgage with no involvment from her mother.We lived in house for approx 3 years, as our PPR, and then due to family circumstances, we bought elsewhere and now rent out the house to a married couple. She was on an interest only(tracker) for a number of years and recently the bank have approched her to say that it's time to start paying the capital and Int back. We can't afford to do that (i.e. the full amount) at the moment so have started the standard financial statement (SFS) process. She has never missed a payment so far.
The bank are now saying that as my wife is named on another mortgage contract, she's changed the terms and conditions of the contract and it's not her PPR anymore, however having had a look in the contract it does not mention that the mortgage will be used only for a PPR specifically. It does state "family home" (once and unrelated to the conditions of the mortgage) but under the Family home protection act, the definition can be interpretted different ways. We are not unwilling to keep paying, but the bank just seem to want to get her off her tracker as a priority, and believe they are not listening to us and what we can afford to pay. In fact we've stated we could pay more in two years, once current set expenditure reduces, but the bank is also asking her mother to fill out an SFS now and also looking for details from me and to fill a form out also (again I have no contractual link to the mortgage, so I wonder are they chancing thier arm here and asking?).
I thought the purpose of the SFS and MARP was to work with buyers in difficulties(again not one payment has been missed to date by my wife) and find the tone and approach of the bank to be quite agressive.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.