I agree. Better the cut them lose and take the hit.
If Greece leaves the Euro then eventually all members will leave because the markets will round on the bond yields of the southern countries and Ireland. The markets will believe the euro is reversible. The problems with the euro would need to be fixed to avoid breakup and I don't think there is the political will or public support for common tax, common fiscal authority and mutualised debt.
Very interesting 3-part article by Der Spiegel below. When I opened each in Chrome it tries to print the arcticle, but just hit Cancel and it is displayed in an easy-to-read layout.
It looks like both Left & Right governments in Greece were both cooking the books over the years. The outcome does not look particularly rosy for Ireland either I must say....have our bond rates started moving north yet??
[broken link removed]
[broken link removed]
[broken link removed]
The fact we have lent so little to Greece means we are not on the hook in the same way as other countries are. No doubt we would feel some pain though...I've mentioned our cost of finance could rise following a GREXIT. It would be probably better for Ireland if Greece stayed as it would keep the focus off us. But for the Greeks and the longterm stability of the euro, I think the Greeks should leave..Be careful what you wish for.
This was never a single issue of "saving the Euro"! While a Grexit would have been un-palliative to the Eurozone it would not necessarily precipitate a break-up or a 2 tier Euro. All of the remaining "PIG" type countries have co-operated in reaching austerity type agreements and all are complying with these agreements to date. Iceland was in a better position than Greece to default because it was outside the Eurozone. Most of its problems were historical and they reverted to a balanced budgetary position without the need of extensive external funds. German/Finland proposal for a 5 year exit was the alternative option open to Greece and that appears to be a worse option for them than the very severe package now proposed.
All current indications are that it will be supported in parliament by the opposition who are more right wing than Syrzia. Yes a Syrzia split is likely and either way it would appear that their time has come and gone.
Very harsh decisions had to be made by Greece whatever agreement was reached. Anti -austerity approach is fine where a realistic alternative is put forward. However the funds have now dried up and Greece is now both insolvent and Illiquid. Banks are closed and the economy is descending into a cash only society. This is not sustainable for any economy and even the Left wing Syrzia realize that they are in a frying-pan/fire scenario.
Unfortunately when the previous proposal was put to the Greek people the downside risk of a No vote was never adequately explained to them. Similarly when the troika entered Ireland had a Left wing Government put a choice to the people of austerity or no-austerity I'm sure it would also have been declined. Populism and realism are not frequent bedfellows. If so Joe Higgins and his party would be our next Government.
While Government Economies are not quite similar to those of a family there are broad similarities. The main one being that if you continually spend more than you earn you will eventually run out of cash and credit. What would the borrowing costs to Greece be if the exited the Euro? Also who would lend to them without a budget program that would facilitate a return to a balanced budget scenario. Russia are not going to finance a soft bail-out and even Syrzia recognize that their offer would come at a high price!
Over past few months i have read mountains of news coverage about the Greek situation but I still dont know why they need 86 billion in a new bailout. A few simple facts would be appreciated to put my mind at easeThis was never a single issue of "saving the Euro"! While a Grexit would have been un-palliative to the Eurozone it would not necessarily precipitate a break-up or a 2 tier Euro. All of the remaining "PIG" type countries have co-operated in reaching austerity type agreements and all are complying with these agreements to date. Iceland was in a better position than Greece to default because it was outside the Eurozone. Most of its problems were historical and they reverted to a balanced budgetary position without the need of extensive external funds. German/Finland proposal for a 5 year exit was the alternative option open to Greece and that appears to be a worse option for them than the very severe package now proposed.
All current indications are that it will be supported in parliament by the opposition who are more right wing than Syrzia. Yes a Syrzia split is likely and either way it would appear that their time has come and gone.
Very harsh decisions had to be made by Greece whatever agreement was reached. Anti -austerity approach is fine where a realistic alternative is put forward. However the funds have now dried up and Greece is now both insolvent and Illiquid. Banks are closed and the economy is descending into a cash only society. This is not sustainable for any economy and even the Left wing Syrzia realize that they are in a frying-pan/fire scenario.
Unfortunately when the previous proposal was put to the Greek people the downside risk of a No vote was never adequately explained to them. Similarly when the troika entered Ireland had a Left wing Government put a choice to the people of austerity or no-austerity I'm sure it would also have been declined. Populism and realism are not frequent bedfellows. If so Joe Higgins and his party would be our next Government.
While Government Economies are not quite similar to those of a family there are broad similarities. The main one being that if you continually spend more than you earn you will eventually run out of cash and credit. What would the borrowing costs to Greece be if the exited the Euro? Also who would lend to them without a budget program that would facilitate a return to a balanced budget scenario. Russia are not going to finance a soft bail-out and even Syrzia recognize that their offer would come at a high price!
Over past few months i have read mountains of news coverage about the Greek situation but I still dont know why they need 86 billion in a new bailout. A few simple facts would be appreciated to put my mind at ease
50B is the amount they've been asked to sell. The value of Greek government assets would be in the hundreds of billions - maybe more than a trillion. Parks, land, buildings, military assets, state owned businesses - it's a big country.Greece owes circa 300 billion, Value of Greek assets 50 Billion....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?