Early Riser
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,643
Other than not being able to get a bridging loan. If they don't need a bridging loan they can put their house on the open market like everybody else, then look around for whatever suits them.
Yes, but what is available to them? A 3 bed semi miles away and miles from anywhere that still needs adaptation? Not very appealing for most and certainly not future proofed re support needs. Best to stay put in a large but familiar house, even if unsuitable.
We are not able to collect rent or build a Hospital without costing several times what is should be ,Immediate action is required
·People living on their own should be told to find someone else in the same position and share with them.
If the 2,258 people living in 3 and 4 bed houses moved into the spare room in the 2 bed houses, then we would immediately have 2,064 three bed houses and 194 four bed houses immediately available to house people.
We should not build any more social housing in Dublin other than one bed units and gradually move everyone living on their own into these.
We should immediately stop the sale of any social housing at a discount
We should ban successor tenancies – where a child inherits their parent’s social housing.
Long term action
Housing needs should be reviewed every 5 years and people should be moved to more appropriate housing whether that is larger or smaller.
He moved out of the house he called home for 12 years in January and is now living in a one-bedroom maisonette, which he described as "damn comfortable."
Mr Phelan gave up his social housing home to Kieran Ritchie and fiancee Lauren, who were in a two-bedroom property where their ten-year-old son and eight-year-old daughter had to share a room.
The family were on the waiting list for a bigger house for seven years.
There are many owners who have already downsized. As has already been stated in this thread a lack of suitable properties to downsize to is a big impediment to others considering this.This is fantastic, first he serves his country as a soldier then does a genuinely nice act like this.
I don't think it should be limited to people in social housing however to lead by example. People who own their own homes should also consider downsizing, by selling up or renting out their properties that are now too big for them.
This would go along way to resolving the housing crisis, and all done willingly.
This would go along way to resolving the housing crisis, and all done willingly.
'It was the right thing to do' - former soldier gives up three-bedroom home to help young family
'I've downsized now and I'm very happy and happy to see they're happy'
https://www.independent.ie/breaking...droom-home-to-help-young-family-37860154.html
I don't think it is fair to say social housing is free. There are rents to be paid on it and also the people living in social pay taxes too - like our soldier friend.
I said essentially free. Which it is when you compare it too what one would pay on the open market
A nothing point really. Everyone working pays taxes, whether in social housing or private. Bringing that into the discussion on LA rents doesn't washDepending obviously on how much a person earned, but over 40yrs from 1979 to 2019 an elderly person could have easily contributed far more in taxes than the cost to build the property.
I had missed that point earlier ....it's stunning to actually think someone in a Govt Dept dreamt that up and brought it this farFair play to him, it's a nice story.
However, this sentence from the article stands out for me:
The unpublished report says older people living in social housing will be offered financial incentives before the end of the year, ahead of extending the scheme to private homeowners.
So someone gets essentially free housing courtesy of their fellow taxpayers for life and now they are to get even more money to move somewhere else. Some country!!!
Glad to see people are beginning to cop on TDs who claim to be right-wing tricking voters who are uninformed the don't realise the far-left would not get away with bringing in these kind of changes,I had missed that point earlier ....it's stunning to actually think someone in a Govt Dept dreamt that up and brought it this far.
Surely it cannot be part of any final proposals!
Fair play to him, it's a nice story.
However, this sentence from the article stands out for me:
The unpublished report says older people living in social housing will be offered financial incentives before the end of the year, ahead of extending the scheme to private homeowners.
So someone gets essentially free housing courtesy of their fellow taxpayers for life and now they are to get even more money to move somewhere else. Some country!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?