New Testament Luke 1:26-28
"In the sixth month, the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin's name was Mary. And he came to her and said, "Greetings, favoured one! The Lord is with you." But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be. The angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favour with God. And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him This post will be deleted if not edited immediately. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end." Mary said to the angel, "How can this be, since I am a virgin?" The angel said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God. And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month for her who was said to be barren. For nothing will be impossible with God." Then Mary said, "Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word."
Can't you see the contradiction here. The male is guilty for not taking his own precautions and yet in the George Hook case the victim carries no responsibility for throwing all caution to the wind."male party no way wants to be "pregnant"."
It is relatively easy to prevent.
I don't see that the relationship is in any way adversarial, in fact, only God's messenger is present with Mary to put God's case and take her response back. I don't understand the extrapolations you make from events you don't know about. . The Christian churches that teach about Mary's impregnation regard it as miraculous. There is no mention of assault or rape or lack of consent and none of these are present in any writing of the events. I've asked you to produce evidence for your point of view; it's clear at this stage you have none.if you consider God vs. Mary to be a relationship of equal standing, jolly good.
Of course we have an entire religion, promulgated for 2,000 years, predicated on a woman's rape so its no wonder that rape culture is engrained.
"No man I know thinks it is in any way acceptable to in any way force anyone into a sexual act."
Indeed.
And yet rape still happens, everyday, in all populations, in all countries, against all ages.
.. New Testament Luke 1:26-28
I'm disturbed by a mindset which can find offense and oppressive male dominance of "wemmen" in just about everything.I'm amused by the mixing of a widly theoretical conversation with real world events.
"No man I know thinks it is in any way acceptable to in any way force anyone into a sexual act."
Indeed.
And yet rape still happens, everyday, in all populations, in all countries, against all ages.
No man I know thinks it is in any way acceptable to murder someone. And yet murder still happens, everyday, in all populations, in all countries, against all ages. So do you think that murder culture is also engrained?
So they are not the result of a "culture" as otherwise they would be normal people.A very experienced criminal lawyer friend of mine, who has defended many people accused of the most heinous crimes says that he can understand murderers, they are ordinary people who whether through weakness or pressure have done a terrible thing. That we all experience feelings, which brought to an extreme could lead to murder. He says that in his experience rapists are identifiably different from ordinary people.
I don't think it's excellent at all. She does the usual thing of conflating rape, women's rights generally and abortion as if you are some sort of misogynistic pig who things it's okay to sexually assault women if you don't support abortion. I find her article and its implications grossly offensive just as much as I found George Hook's comments grossly offensive.Kitty Holland has an excellent article in todays IT about George and his comments.
https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/george-hook-should-be-challenged-not-silenced-1.3219952
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?