The Irish Times report that the OECD and Central Bank accepted that the Irish property market is overvalued by 15 per cent, but [font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Central Bank officials begged off sharing this with the constituents "in case it might destabilise the Irish property market" gives cause for fear - not only in that what many people felt about the property market in the past few years is confirmed, but in the decision not to disclose facts which are in the public interest and should be in the public realm![/font]
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]An account of the meeting produced by the OECD, and seen by The Irish Times, states: "There is clearly a speculative element and econometric work by the OECD secretariat suggests prices are 15 per cent overvalued."[/font]
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]The think-tank represents 24 of the world's leading economies, including Ireland. It conducts in-depth studies of a range of policy topics and issues policy advice to its member states.[/font]
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Translated, does this not mean "The Establishment decided to support the interests of Big Money over the wellbeing of ordinary citizens, even in the teeth of uncoerced, expert witness".[/font]
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif][/font]
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]While not disagreeing with the figure presented, the Central Bank officials indicated their nervousness about presenting such figures in public. The OECD records them as stating: "They suggested that any numerical estimate of overvaluation should be presented only with extreme caution to avoid destabilising the market."[/font]
Clearly they can't disagree with the facts, and one can understand this 'nervousness' at a sudden outing of the truth.
Surely 'the truth' and an end to the upward spiral will bring the craziness to an end, no losers? The speculators and entrepreneurs have made their "fabulous wealth"; the ordinary punters have got something out of it by dabbling in the rental market through a couple of properties funded by interest-only loans.....so they have a few bob and a lot of experience; people needing homes or apartments to rent have benefited because everyone was watching "makeover' programmes on t.v., refurbishing,redesigning and making life more aesthetically pleasing........so they learned as well. The 'frenzy' kicked 'the system' into motion and now there are lots and lots of houses.........so first-time buyers and newly-establishing couples have more choice.
Where's the 'victim' of this truth that it had to be suppressed.......or have I missed something?