Gordon Gekko
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,847
Welsh guy quotes 300 grand to do a job.Run away - .75% + .75% is 1.50%
If he can't even add?
The addition was my mistake.. but 1.5% obviously not in the ballpark.Run away - .75% + .75% is 1.50%
If he can't even add?
1.5% to 2%pa is actually the right ballpark for a properly disclosed ARF in Ireland.The addition was my mistake.. but 1.5% obviously not in the ballpark.
Lol. I'm trying to find the Welsh guy as long as the work is the same.Welsh guy quotes 300 grand to do a job.
Scottish guy quotes 600 grand to do the job.
Irish guy quotes 900 grand.
“900 grand?! That’s outrageous!”
“Not really, 300 grand for me, 300 grand for you, and we pay the Welsh guy 300 grand to do the job!”
Thanks Clubman. I understand that now. There is no crystal ball for the future.Sounds like you really need to shop around for a better advisor than the two that you're currently talking to. There are a few here on AAM who I reckon would be much better...
Also, you have asked a few times about "good performing funds". This doesn't really make sense. What you need to focus on are (a) charges and (b) what sort of asset mix and fund type and risk/reward/volatility profile (e.g. medium to high equity content, passively managed index tracker etc.) suits your needs. Looking at past performance is pointless.
Any I tried get uncomfortable discussing fees and try to gloss over them.Don't be shy about pressing them on the fee's. Just ask bluntly for a transparent breakdown of the fees. Then ask them to use your sum as an example.
I.E. "If I invest 500K with you on the plan we are speaking about, please break down exactly how much I will pay in fee's and what the ongoing cost will be"
Some people are a little embarrassed to do that, don't be. It's important and it also tells you a bit about the guy. If they are transparent and up front about all fee's, then I'll consider using them. If you get the feeling they are being cagey or haven't explained their fee structure clearly, it puts me off straight away and I wouldn't even consider using them. Ask about commissions etc. too just to make sure they don't have a vested interest in steering you in a certain direction.
Don't be shy about pressing them on the fee's. Just ask bluntly for a transparent breakdown of the fees. Then ask them to use your sum as an example.
I.E. "If I invest 500K with you on the plan we are speaking about, please break down exactly how much I will pay in fee's and what the ongoing cost will be"
Some people are a little embarrassed to do that, don't be. It's important and it also tells you a bit about the guy. If they are transparent and up front about all fee's, then I'll consider using them. If you get the feeling they are being cagey or haven't explained their fee structure clearly, it puts me off straight away and I wouldn't even consider using them. Ask about commissions etc. too just to make sure they don't have a vested interest in steering you in a certain direction.
What Marc said above sort of upsets the applecart...
In my opinion, there are two pertinent questions regarding charges here - e.g.I.E. "If I invest 500K with you on the plan we are speaking about, please break down exactly how much I will pay in fee's and what the ongoing cost will be
The gold standard for fee disclosure isn't applied uniformly in Ireland. This is an example of what I would typically provide to a client based on a typical ARF in our business of €1m
Marc Westlake CFP, TEP, APFS, QFA, EFP
Chartered Certified and European Financial Planner
Everlake
?your own fund bets
The funds you researched and hope to do well in the future. Is it not similar studying form with a horse?
The thread that I linked above included an ARF with an AMC of 0.35% - 2% (or anything remotely like it) is a complete rip off.So at the end of the day maybe 2% in total is not too far off the mark for a full honest declaration of fees.
Sorry, SarencoThe thread that I linked above included an ARF with an AMC of 0.35% - 2% (or anything remotely like it) is a complete rip off.
Forget about making “fund bets” - just pick a reasonable allocation to global stock/bond index funds (I would suggest 60/40 as a default for an ARF).
No.The funds you researched and hope to do well in the future. Is it not similar studying form with a horse?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?