This is my understanding of what's happening in this space at the moment.
The product providers were waiting to see how this 'too good to be true' scenario with PRSAs plays out with Revenue. If the new rules are not going to be changed then the competition for large once-off company contributions to PRSAs will intensify. The lure of hundreds of thousands of Euro moving from company accounts to PRSAs, in one payment, has product providers salivating. But, they can't just introduce a new pricing structure at will, it has to go through a process with the Pension Authority.
Product providers have to decide what pricing structure/s they want to 'buy' approval on. There's a risk that the new rules on PRSAs will change so they're a bit cagey on the number of new structures they want to buy and where to set their base charge. PRSAs are more expensive to the product providers than Master Trust or other pre/post retirement products.
What I think has happened already is that one provider has decided that they're not going into the Master Trust (MT) space at all so they've repriced their PRSA to compete with the current Master Trust offerings. The MT providers have not all shown their full hand yet on the pricing of MTs though.
The expediency of this repricing would suggest that the structure was there already but the provider has just changed how they pay the intermediary from the product whilst having no effect on what the end consumer buys. Maybe someone else can clarify that.
So, assuming Revenue don't shift the goalposts, you can expect competition in the once-off / large lump sum PRSA space to intensify. This is good for the consumer because there are no exit charges allowed on PRSAs or MTs so they will be able to move without penalty at any time. I'd expect that in the next 3/4 months that we might see everyone's hand in the pricing.
Gerard
www.prsa.ie