Here on aam, the advice seems to be to pay it off to get a guaranteed risk free return.
I have heard advice from Paul Merriman of ask_paul on instagram promote the same thing. In one scenario he suggests if the rate is 3 or 3.5% then it might be worthwhile paying it off but if it's lower than that you should invest your money and try to make it work harder for you.
Different strategies I suppose.
If you have 20 years left on a mortgage, would the money not work harder for you in an investment account over a long period like that than being used to pay off the mortgage. Also, its available to access if there was an emergency whereas when you pay the mortgage its gone.
Yes, reading it looks like there's a bit of double counting of the tax going on by both grossing up the mortgage interest rate, and comparing to the net after tax return of investing. Calculating the net, after tax, investment return and comparing to interest rate should be sufficient.It’s a decent piece of work.
The slight criticism I’d have relates to the 52%.
I don’t think it’s relevant.
It’s the tax rate applicable to the investment that’s relevant.
When you take the tax on etfs into account, it isn't really worth the risk.It's been mentioned a few times that its only worth investing outside a pension if you have a low interest rate. What is the rate we're aiming for. Cheapest rate currently available is 1.95% with Avant Money. Global ETFs have returned greater than 10% over the last 10 years and I think about 8% over the last 20 with fees of a fraction of a percent. There's obviously a personal risk tolerance here but what's the consensus?
(dependent on pension earnings) In brackets but very very important in this whole scenario.Nice article. I like the graph for grossing up interest rates. Would be nice if you pushed the article a bit further at the end and created a table showing the difference in return after taxes for the two strategies using various tax rates that could apply on pension drawdown (dependent on pension earnings), and subtracted the extra interest paid.
After 8 years in the vangaurd all world fund Id have made an annualised 5.22% after tax, still retained access to my money and my mortgage would be costing 1.95?When you take the tax on etfs into account, it isn't really worth the risk.
Did you read the report Marc posted 1 page back?After 8 years in the vangaurd all world fund Id have made an annualised 5.22% after tax, still retained access to my money and my mortgage would be costing 1.95?
Assuming the 20 year average return of 8%.
I'm not trying to be argumentative, just trying to get the thought process straight in my mind. There must be a line after which it makes sense or a way to figure out that cut off point. But maybe I'm just not giving the guaranteed nature of the mortgage return enough credit (past performance not a guide to future returns etc. but over many decades it seems you still come out ahead from a low fee index?)
What was the mortgage rate 8 years ago though when you made this hypothetical investment? If you think 8% returns from this point are likely when the risk-free rate is 0, you're living in fantasy-land!After 8 years in the vangaurd all world fund Id have made an annualised 5.22% after tax, still retained access to my money and my mortgage would be costing 1.95?
Assuming the 20 year average return of 8%.
Well done.It's not for everyone and could have easily have gone wrong, just pointing out it can be done.