presidenttttt
Registered User
- Messages
- 333
But it is much better to pay off your mortgage than
- to invest in an investment product as it would have to make a very large return before tax and expenses to be better.
- as most people do, leave it sitting in a deposit account earning very little
- as many do, to just blow it on things you don't really need.
Brendan
I set-up an investment portfolio. It does well and makes 6%. I’d be doing well to get away with fees of 1%. And then call tax 40% of the gross. That’s 2.6%. Taxes are not an exact science but taking 40% as a blend of 33%, 41%, and 52% shouldn’t be too far off.
Hi Brendan, is there any data on this? You state most people leave excess income sit in a savings account. I would be curious to know how many people who can overpay their mortgage actually do it?
We don't know what mortgage rates will be over life of mortgage, so while a return guaranteed, the return is not guaranteed.
We don't know what mortgage rates will be over life of mortgage, so while a return guaranteed, the return is not guaranteed.
I repeatedly see people on this site, repeating the mantra incorrectly, 'it's a guaranteed 2-3 p.c. forever', and I wanted to correct this. We don't have crystal ball for mortgage rates or market returns.
INot a line from a broker. A line from me! But if you are quoting me, Please let the customer know, I strongly agree with paying down mortgage, having money just sitting in a deposit account is a big waste.
It's much less clear to me if the choice is pension investment vs mortgage overpayment. if higher tax relief available and employer match is not maximized I think pension definitely wins. I think pension likely wins even if only higher rate tax relief is available.
But I think more personalized guidance is needed before deciding to invest rather than paydown mortgage.
Brendan, does similar economic logic, imply the stock market return should be higher than the mortgage interest rate.
Brendan, does similar economic logic, imply the stock market return should be higher than the mortgage interest rate.
I repeatedly see people on this site, repeating the mantra incorrectly, 'it's a guaranteed 2-3 p.c. forever', and I wanted to correct this. We don't have crystal ball for mortgage rates or market returns.
I dont understand the last two posts.
I thouggt we have been saying that pay down mortg generally makes sense versus investing because invedt would need to do exceptionally well to beat the guaranteed retirn in paying fown mortgage.
How does that logic suddenly not apply to last parag in SPCs last post above?
What releavnce re marginal rate tax payer?
If mortg is say 2%, wouldnt the pension investment, regardless of whther marginal tax payer or not, still need to do exceptionally well to beat guaranteed mortg return? Why, in this instance, is it more advisable to invest rather than pay down mortg?
I dont understand the last two posts.
I thouggt we have been saying that pay down mortg generally makes sense versus investing because invedt would need to do exceptionally well to beat the guaranteed retirn in paying fown mortgage.
How does that logic suddenly not apply to last parag in SPCs last post above?
What releavnce re marginal rate tax payer?
If mortg is say 2%, wouldnt the pension investment, regardless of whther marginal tax payer or not, still need to do exceptionally well to beat guaranteed mortg return? Why, in this instance, is it more advisable to invest rather than pay down mortg?
I've seen him ask "which do you need, critical illness cover or income protection?", then answer "you need both" . . more ropey advise in my opinion.He needs to use the brain a bit more.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?