Shem said:It really surprises me how you can't work this out, especially about the 88 lines you get a week for £5.
1/49th share of 88 lines for £5, right?
Shem said:It really surprises me how you can't work this out, especially about the 88 lines you get a week for £5.
This is just crazy - one-third of the money actually goes into the lottery, and Shem still thinks that this is a good deal. Shem - Please show us the maths that you used to prove that investing 1/3 of your money in lottery tickets gives you a better chance of winning than investing 3/3 of your money in tickets.Shrek31 said:36% Lottery entry costs.
For those whose commissions and 'free' entries are coming out of the subs paid in by the mugs below them, sure.Shem said:...I can't understand why anyone would think that is a bad deal!
RainyDay said:This is just crazy - one-third of the money actually goes into the lottery, and Shem still thinks that this is a good deal. Shem - Please show us the maths that you used to prove that investing 1/3 of your money in lottery tickets gives you a better chance of winning than investing 3/3 of your money in tickets.
I think you've left out a "don't" somewhere in that sentance.dillon1876 said:Have you people nothing better to do than to rant and rave and complain about things you have the brain capacity to understand??
RainyDay said:I think you've left out a "don't" somewhere in that sentance.
If you'd like to explain how losing 2/3rds of your subscription in fees makes it a good investment, I'm sure we'll all be delighted to hear it.
MagicMoose said:An open mind should not be so open that your brains fall out.
Please check out this post before judging
[broken link removed]
Who is that directed at?