Ron Burgundy
Registered User
- Messages
- 752
While the budget cuts are severe and have cost most families several thousand per annum in disposable income which certainly will make people think more about how they spend their income and cut back on luxuries, it should not put anyone who has been sensible about their spending in serious financial trouble.
Did you ever hear of contingency? Most sensible people leave a margin of contingency in their budgeting as there is always a possibility of unforeseen expenses. This contingency is not always about putting money away for a rainy day, more often than not for younger families its a matter of making sure that you do not have too high a percentage longer term committed expenditure that you cannot make adjustments at short notice. Long term committed expenditure includes likes of mortgages and significant bank loans e.g. car loans. If you have too much of your disposable income timed up in committed expenditure, you have only yourself to blame. Chances are if the tax increases didnt get you, something else would have within the next few years.
Has anyone else picked up on the "I wish the new Lisbon Treaty vote was next week so that we can vote Yes this time" vibe around the place or is it just me?
So i'm not the only one with this view and the fact that the now generation have a serious shock coming in the next while !
Nope you're not and I had enough of a memory of the bad times to know that even when times seemed to be unlimited wealth, let's just live within a nice budget and save up for the stuff we really want.
I say that not to be smug or I told you so. Say that the we'll all die from an asteroid strike for long enough and eventually you'll get to say "I told you so". I'm lucky we didn't get caught up in the rush to be a consumer, but just like I don't see the Government as the sole architects of our doom, I don't feel I want to rub people's noses in it too much either.
I'm just not sure that I can be happy that people will face this shock. I'm not sure I can be smug about it. (not saying you are btw).
I really do sympathise with those who did take up the banks and the consumer idea. Jon Ronson looked at the subprime issue over 2 years ago, it's pretty frightening how people were targeted for this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2007/feb/10/creditcards.debt
I do feel for the now generation because i think it really will hit them hard.
If you mean teenagers, I think its the best thing that will ever happen to them. There is a whole generation of spoilt, over indulged kids out there who think life owes them a designer wardrobe, three foreign holidays a year, state of the art mobiles etc etc. Its about time they got a wake up call. I don't want to sound harsh, and I know not all teenagers are like that, but it was a frightening thought that the future of this country was in the hands of such a materialistic, sheltered, over protected generation.
If you mean teenagers, I think its the best thing that will ever happen to them. There is a whole generation of spoilt, over indulged kids out there who think life owes them a designer wardrobe, three foreign holidays a year, state of the art mobiles etc etc. Its about time they got a wake up call. I don't want to sound harsh, and I know not all teenagers are like that, but it was a frightening thought that the future of this country was in the hands of such a materialistic, sheltered, over protected generation.
Um an obvious question: who spoilt them? So how is a potential slide back to mass unemployment, emigration good for them? How is it that good for anyone?
No one said it was good but you have to learn to within your means and the best lessons in life are the hardest.
Also if everything in life is handed to you on a plate how do you know the value of it or money ? What i'm saying isn't nice but neither will life be for the next few years.......if you see the bad then when the good comes along you won't take it for granted.
The ipod fairy just died.
I totally agree with this. I'm not saying unemployment for young people is a good thing but I do think learning to do without, save up, prioritise what you need, learn that money doesn't grow on trees etc is very important. My post was in relation to a remark about 'feeling sorry' for this generation and, to be honest, my sympathy is with the older generation who have spent their lives making do and putting up. Just when they were able to relax a bit and enjoy life, they now have to pay for the mess made by the generation below them.No one said it was good but you have to learn to within your means and the best lessons in life are the hardest.
Also if everything in life is handed to you on a plate how do you know the value of it or money ? What i'm saying isn't nice but neither will life be for the next few years.......if you see the bad then when the good comes along you won't take it for granted.
The ipod fairy just died.
I totally agree with this. I'm not saying unemployment for young people is a good thing but I do think learning to do without, save up, prioritise what you need, learn that money doesn't grow on trees etc is very important. My post was in relation to a remark about 'feeling sorry' for this generation and, to be honest, my sympathy is with the older generation who have spent their lives making do and putting up. Just when they were able to relax a bit and enjoy life, they now have to pay for the mess made by the generation below them.
This is very unbalanced. Indeed, buyers do need to bear responsibility for their own actions, but they had very few options. The Govt was delighted to sit back and watch the banks/builders inflate inflate inflate prices until they reached an unsustainable level. It was everything to do with FF's relationship with the construction industry.The mortgage borrowing was nothing to do with FF, it was the desire/need/compulsion of people to own their own homes at any cost. I don't blame them, I don't blame the government, I don't even blame the banks. It happened all over the world because all the banks are global. The banks used to be a cartel, then measures were intorduced to deregulate and to introduce competition. Once the potential was realised across the world in the sub prime market that's when it went wrong.
I feel sorry for the majority the young( and middle/old aged), who I believe, are decent and hard working. Not only are they victims of a corrupt and incompetent government, they have to put up with comments like this - suggesting that they need to learn that 'money doesn't grow on trees'. The young people I know, worked hard in school and college, and in the workplace to build successful lives. They didn't create the conditions where house prices rocketed out of control, or banks loaned vast sums to developers to speculate.
Some posters on this thread suggest that people should have lived within their means, and built in contingency. Good for those who had the means to do this, but plenty didn't, because they needed somewhere to live, and a car to commute to work, and money to pay for childcare etc.
Even if everyone had managed to provide for reasonable contingency (say 10%), its clear that the FF mob are going to take a further 10% in December, and even more later. So, where does contingency planning end - should we have been putting 30%,40%,50%.....away for a rainy day.
To those FF/Green supporters, high earning public servants, independently wealthy,tax exiles and others who are cosseted from reality , I suggest you come out of your ivory towers into the real world, and you will see that the rest of us have been screwed by this government, and we aren't prepared to settle for a moral lecture, or for a 'dance at the cross road'.........
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?