My questions
1. has any one else had this problem.
My wife received a bill from eFlow saying she used the M50 toll bridge last week and didnt pay the toll by the deadline and its an offence under various road traffic acts etc. She hasnt driven this car on the M50 for at least 3 months and was at home & car in driveway at the time in question (very very early in morning - was in bed) so we are 100% sure that this bill is in error.
Tried ringing customer services, but kept on getting message that operators are busy etc. and call was simply cut off - couldnt even wait in queue. So instead she rang the "pay your bill" number and surprise surprise, the phone was instantly answered. She asked the eFlow employee why she was being billed when she hadnt used the M50. Got the usual denial questions i.e. "are you sure...", ".. did anyone borrow your car...",".....but your car was picked up on camera....have picture...you must be mistaken......" etc. etc. essentially trying to accuse her of being a liar. She got annoyed with them and asked "what make and color is my car?" (testing the picture the employee was claiming to have i.e. if employee said "your car is a red nissan etc. (which it isnt)", then must be misread of plate. When she asked this question, the employee got real defensive saying..."well....I dont have the picture on front of me...". Wife got annoyed demanded to be sent a copy of the picture they claim to have and employee got more defensive...."well....not sure...dont give them out (isnt there a Data Protection Act issue here?) etc...". Call ended with employee saying "I'll record that you are disputing the charge and someone will check and call back". Nobody has called back & dont know how they will as she realised afterwards that they never asked for her phone number & her caller ID was turned off.
Anyone know what they do from this point forward? Do they check the picture of the car and write back apologising etc.? Anyone managed to get a picture out of them yet? I assume that they must keep them on file as they would need them in the event of a case going to Court, yet their refusal to supply them seems contrary to Data Protection Act.
Wife is so annoyed with their attitude that, if they dont withdraw the charge and apologise, she'll let it go to court, embarrass them on front of the Judge (as we are 100% sure we are correct).