Gordon Gekko
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,846
Yes, that makes sense.Hi Gordon
The 3.5 times income test is used only to approve or reject a loan.
I would have no problem with a lender incorporating the LTI in setting their rates, but I don't think any of them do. (I have an idea that some lender does not offer all rates to people who get an LTI exemption, but I can't remember which one.)
Avant uses both LTV, and for the One Mortgage, the mortgage term. So a 15 year loan is cheaper than a 30 year loan with the same LTV. But I think that is the only non-LTV criterion used for setting rates.
Brendan
I was thinking more of the conditions that a lender such as Avant applies for 1.95% cases, such as the property being in an urban area. Avant could in theory buy some mortgages from Ulster Bank and then refuse to allow internal switches to 1.95% for properties in Leitrim.
I think there may be something in the questions that were being asked by the lender. i.e. that there may be something in the responses that meant the borrower wouldn’t qualify for the lower rates if he or she was external. For example, overstretched in some other way.
The 1.95% rates seem to be reserved for “super-prime” cases externally, so why not internally also? It shouldn’t necessarily be the case that once a borrower is through the gates that it becomes a free-for-all.