I totaly agree that's why insurance should be made reasonably priced,
and why not treat road accidents with no insurance as regular emergency cases and pool it with health insurance ?
I am not an expert and I am sure that the're are totaly acceptable soutions that would cost < 25% of the current cost but there are special interest that will prevent any change unless people protest.
whether your opinions are right or not. It still doesn't justify you driving with no insurance. The fact that there's a significant premium added to my policy to cover uninsured drivers pushes up the cost.
However, up until recently prices did drop, but this wasn't sustainable as the real costs to the companies stayed static or increased. So prices dropped, but the number of claims still increased and awards didn't decrease.
Your pathetic justification not only falls down on several elements, but it's also because of you that there is a premium added to insurance.