A friend has recently been offered an apartment down in the Docklands and concerned about the unknown implications of having the DDDA on the deeds of the property ran it by an estate agent friend of his....who's opinion was...don't go near it!
Yea, I am very concerned about this my self. For me this could be a deal breaker. If I am forced into a corner where it’s a case of legal advice ending up, “sign that and you are signing your rights away” then I will walk away from the purchase. I will be really disappointed if that happened, but I am only going to be a first time buyer once, and I do not intend painting my self into a corner if you get me and to be honest the open market is really Turing in my favour.
I think my main concern is with the DDDA insisting on having first option on the resale of the property. The main question and concern I have is will they produce their own valuation for what they say the property is worth at that time and will it be binding on us (like their present unrealistic valuation!) or will the purchase price be based on what the property could actually fetch on the open market?
I imagine it will be the former.
This is one of many concerns that I have about this shared deed situation. I want to know other things like
will the council have access rights to the properties?
Will the council have any say over who I may or may not want to rent a room to?
Will the council be interfering in anyway with my ownership of the property?
what does being listed on the deeds of a property actually mean? In practice?
Why do they want to be on the deeds when DCC never bothers to do the same?
If the DDDA is a joint owner of my property will they be paying half my management fees for me? Ok that’s a bit of humour, but in all fairness the repercussions of being a joint owner with the council are endless ….
The list is getting longer as I am thinking about the whole thing. :-(
A couple of weeks ago I received their valuation for the property I am hoping to purchase and it is well over any realistic market value....but naturally gives them a higher claw-back percentage.
Now my intention is to live in the property, don't really see myself moving out of the city, but life changes and who knows what will occur in the future...
It's maddening not to be able to obtain this information from the DDDA themselves. All of this should be completely transparent! I think they are treating us shabbily.
Starky: I just saw your post where you mentioned that the DDA have re-valued your property and came in with a lower (more realistic) figure. Go figure, mine came in higher than was mentioned in the newsletter!
The DDDA have listed my apartment as being worth 470. I have had independent valuations done and they are all coming in above that figure. I honestly thought it was worth some where in the region of 420 -440, then again I am not a professional valuator so my valuation was total guesswork. Initially I was worried that they were gong to value it at 550 and then it was only going to be worth 420 or something mental like that. For me anyway the valuation and the claw back all seem very fair, so at least that’s something.
I can’t believe that your apartment has been valued at a higher price then the FMV listed in the original news letter, that’s just mad. Do you mind posting the various figures?
My place is a two bed in forbes quay.