It’s not the correct procedure, unfortunately.Tenant served notice of vacation and are now seeking a substantial amount of money as the last rent review was done via text, which I understand now was not the correct procedure however I was not aware that area had become a rpz.
You have my utmost sympathy.Will the rtb be by the book on this or will they see this situation for what it is - any advice would be appreciated. Also, is there somewhere landlords can get advice on situations like this? All the advice seems to be for tenants.
There probably is, albeit unacknowledged by the RTB/legislation.I feel that both there should be a time limit in relation to both parties claiming for an invalid notice. It seems absurd that a tenant can claim rent back for an indefinite number of years. If they were not happy with the format (text message) then surely they could dispute it there and then - but to leave it go for 2.5 years??
Why do you say this? There is no indication above to support your claim.Presumably your tax returns for the relevant years are now incorrect.
No there isn’t. Legally speaking the rent review never happened if the format was not correct.There probably is, albeit unacknowledged by the RTB/legislation.
Now the rent is down to €6.5k… shouldn’t the tax go down accordingly?
IANAL but if this happened to me, I'd be seeking legal advice onNo there isn’t. Legally speaking the rent review never happened if the format was not correct.
Not a refund.So there will be a refund due
There are none. This is a deliberate policy.what are the relevant limits for a further objection in relation to any previous rent increase? 10 years? 20 years? 50 years?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?