aircobra19
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,733
...
There has been a massive increase in staffing levels in the public sector over the last ten years. Any organisation that hires tens of thousands of people will have problems filling all of the posts. This does not necessarily mean that pay levels are too low.
I don't really understand your point tbh. Thus not really understanding it I would have said one was a loan/credit the other cash. I can't see what it has to do with the thread topic either.
For that matter, and I'm repeating myself, I don't get what the public sector has to do it either with considering the scale of Dell operations worldwide.
Problems with the public sector (vast and many) are as much a symptom rather than a major contributer to the cost base in Ireland and problems with the economy in general. Considering that in many areas you can't attract staff into the Public sector because wages are better in the private sector. Thats mainly my own direct experence than, the popular mass media and public opinion of massive wages far beyond the private sector.
So my own experience is not true. I must have imagined it then.
Aircobra is right to be confused by those who blame Dell's job cuts on public sector wages. Indeed, the knee-jerk almost Pavlovian reaction of some AAM posters who blame everything from bad weather to Dell job cuts on public sector wages is getting seriously tiresome, given the lack of any evidence of even the most tenuous links between the two.I'd also have assumed that wage costs in the Private Sector has a bigger effect on Dells cost base than wages in the Public sector.
I have yet to see any post that blames the public sector for bad weather.Aircobra is right to be confused by those who blame Dell's job cuts on public sector wages. Indeed, the knee-jerk almost Pavlovian reaction of some AAM posters who blame everything from bad weather to Dell job cuts on public sector wages is getting seriously tiresome, given the lack of any evidence of even the most tenuous links between the two.
If you give a very large proportion of the workforce large pay increase (which may or may not be deserved; that’s not the issue here) there will be a knock-on effect in the rest of the economy. If anyone does not see this they do not understand basic economics. This knock-on is what is being discussed. I do agree that general pay increases in non-competitive sectors of the private sector (like construction used to be) have has as much if not more of an impact but whereas these private sector sectors (like construction) are self –correcting during a downturn the public sector is not. This is also self-evident.Any independent observer would conclude that the wages paid to Dell staff was the key factor here, not the wages paid to those who process their P45s. But let's not let common sense get in the way of a good rant. Keep the agenda rolling on....
THis is a chicken and egg arguement. Did the public sector increases cause the private sector increases, or was it perhaps vice versa?If you give a very large proportion of the workforce large pay increase (which may or may not be deserved; that’s not the issue here) there will be a knock-on effect in the rest of the economy. If anyone does not see this they do not understand basic economics. This knock-on is what is being discussed. I do agree that general pay increases in non-competitive sectors of the private sector (like construction used to be) have has as much if not more of an impact but whereas these private sector sectors (like construction) are self –correcting during a downturn the public sector is not. This is also self-evident.
Ah yes, spite, that should be the top priority in how our Public bodies source their IT infrastructure. I'd put it right up there with nepotism, cronyism and the brown envelope in the "how what we run our country" stakes.should government departments and public service organisations now cancel any contracts they have with Dell for the upkeep and replacement of thousands of computers - and source them from companies providing jobs for Irish workers?
I think so.
should government departments and public service organisations now cancel any contracts they have with Dell for the upkeep and replacement of thousands of computers - and source them from companies providing jobs for Irish workers?
I think so.
From June 2006. I should have put a bet on it!I think it's more than likely that Dell in Limerick and Seagate in Derry will both be gone in 5 years.
Ah yes, spite, that should be the top priority in how our Public bodies source their IT infrastructure. I'd put it right up there with nepotism, cronyism and the brown envelope in the "how what we run our country" stakes.
Kudos, you seem to have a fine grasp on the big picture.
What, even if it costs twice as much to go to another company? Why exactly do you want to get even with Dell anyway?. They are still one of the Country's biggest employers even after yesterdays job losses and you want to punish them. Bizarre.
I don't "want to get even with Dell". I simply believe that Irish jobs should be supported by Govt Depts/Public sector organisations. I don't believe that it would cost "twice as much to go to another company". But I do believe, that given the amount of business they could put towards Irish companies, and given the fact that this would possibly save some job losses from the other sectors that depend on the now defunct Dell manufacturing jobs, it would be worth paying a little more to companies providing Irish jobs given the benefits to Ireland as a result.
.
If the Irish government did what you seggest they would be in breach of EU law.Dell will, and have to, put profit first. So that's what they have done. The Government should put Irish jobs first. Hence my opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?