The bank will play hard but they're playing with a yellow card. If they get a red card, and the referee (the Judge) is already less than impressed with them, it's game over.
"The Partnership" needs to be thinking about the end game. A clear vision of how this mess is going to be cleaned up to the satisfaction of The Partnership. Okay, so the Receiver steps aside. But what about the rent that the Receiver never collected? On the instructions of the bank!! Maybe the end game is that the property gets sold, Danske write off the shortfall, and pays all The Partnership's legal costs. Or maybe that is too cheap. Maybe compensation is warranted. Maybe The Partnership want to keep the property and be compensated for lost rent, legal fees, time off work, emotional distress and the rest. Who knows? But clarity as to the desired end result is needed as a starting point for a successful negotiation. And the Partnership should not post their strategy here. This thread has over 8,000 views and chances are that some of them are from Danske and associates.