A bus corridor is planned by the National Transport Authority for one of main arteries into the city in Terenure/Rathgar Dublin 6.
This will be achieved via compulsory purchase orders of front gardens and driveways.
In the last week, CPO notices have appeared in front of each of the three apartment developments on this road. Not a single private house has had a CPO notice put on it.
We own an apartment in a development of four. If the CPO goes ahead, we will lose two of the four parking spaces. Not a huge deal since we could avail of residents parking permits and park in side roads.
But, what I'd like to know is this...
1. Why are the three apartment developments being singled out for CPO and not the private residences? A bus corridor will need a slice of every front garden. Is this a case of testing the water first with low hanging fruit?
2. Is it possible that the NTA would use the CPO and redevelopment of the three apartment blocks as a test? If so, what happens if the scheme spends years in the courts and collapses? Do we get our front drives back? (There's a lot of money on this road; the house-dwellers will not give in easily.)
I have no problem with this development if everyone is treated the same. But, focusing on the apartments to the total exclusion of individual houses smacks of institutional thuggery.
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks.
D.
This will be achieved via compulsory purchase orders of front gardens and driveways.
In the last week, CPO notices have appeared in front of each of the three apartment developments on this road. Not a single private house has had a CPO notice put on it.
We own an apartment in a development of four. If the CPO goes ahead, we will lose two of the four parking spaces. Not a huge deal since we could avail of residents parking permits and park in side roads.
But, what I'd like to know is this...
1. Why are the three apartment developments being singled out for CPO and not the private residences? A bus corridor will need a slice of every front garden. Is this a case of testing the water first with low hanging fruit?
2. Is it possible that the NTA would use the CPO and redevelopment of the three apartment blocks as a test? If so, what happens if the scheme spends years in the courts and collapses? Do we get our front drives back? (There's a lot of money on this road; the house-dwellers will not give in easily.)
I have no problem with this development if everyone is treated the same. But, focusing on the apartments to the total exclusion of individual houses smacks of institutional thuggery.
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks.
D.