Such is the dilemma of the public service. You are trading security against risk, and mobility. Including upward mobility.
You can't get people in a lower wages unless you offer security and potential future earning.
You break that model if you parachute people at higher wages in skipping those who have made that trade off.
If you do that you won't be able to hire people at the lower wages, or retain them, or have any credibility in the security.
At which point you might as well privatize it, which has its own problems.
You can't get people in a lower wages unless you offer security and potential future earning.
You break that model if you parachute people at higher wages in skipping those who have made that trade off.
If you do that you won't be able to hire people at the lower wages, or retain them, or have any credibility in the security.
At which point you might as well privatize it, which has its own problems.