Dr Strangelove
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,480
That would be about right.So she took over "his" share of the mortgage - €70k and paid €80k cash = €150k.
In 2008 stamp duty was 7% on anything in excess of €125k.
That would be about right.So she took over "his" share of the mortgage - €70k and paid €80k cash = €150k.
It would be great if I was able to offset the loss on one half against gain on the other?
I think you have to treat it as two parts, not one.I don't think that anyone has corrected my estimate
I think you have to treat it as two parts, not one.
If I pay you €80,000 in cash and also assume a debt of €70,000 that you owe to someone else, I’ve given you €150,000. The cash outlay part of a red herring. It’s like when you gift something to someone. There’s no cash outlay but there’s still a notional value which can give rise to taxes like stamp duty, CAT, and CGT.But that's not a cash outlay
Brendan many thanks for the time you took to put the above together...one question I have, the relief of 3000 I was able to avail of on the 2nd half of the transaction, should this not have given me a greater loss rather than a lower one? Thks, RosieOK, it is better to do it in two parts because less of the loss on the second part is reduced by the PPR relief.
View attachment 8182
I have, the relief of 3000 I was able to avail of on the 2nd half of the transaction, should this not have given me a greater loss rather than a lower one?