CAO and lottery system

Having gone through the system recently, I find it quite clear once you document yourself and understand the grading. Application to the CAO is straight forward. While really stressful if you are aiming for a challenging goal, what you need to achieve in terms of mark is relatively clear (though the post mark adjustments since covid muddle things). I believe the integrity of the leaving certificate is at risk with the multiplication of projects which would inevitably favor the students with the most resources. Currently students can access grinds, private education and receive help. However at the end of the day they are alone in front of their exam papers. They don't improve their knowledge by osmosis and have to put some kind of work to be able to get a high mark.
 
What the points tables tell you is the lowest scoring applicant who was accepted onto the course scored 426 points. It doesn't tell anyone anything other than that, and it certainly doesn't tell the students filling in their CAO forms anything useful.
And, to be fair, it's not supposed to do that. It's supposed to ensure that places on courses are allocated equitably, and it does that very well.
 
Okay, so to clarify.

The civil servant I spoke of regularly bypassed established protocols, designed to create transparency and to ensure impartiality in a competitive protocols, to create an outcome ensured that rewarded followers, sycophants and the offspring of friends. The person is far from alone in this approach.

I’m pretty sure that’s corrupt.
That's not corrupt (except for the appointment of the children of friends).

Corruption has a meaning. The fight against corruption is really not helped at all if every example of poor management, poor judgement or poor behaviour is labelled "corrupt".
 
Back
Top