CAO and lottery system

Fortune said:
It doesn't tell anyone anything other than that, and it certainly doesn't tell the students filling in their CAO forms anything useful.
Click to expand...
I would dispute that. I had a fair idea of my CAO points range and so did most of my classmates. Teachers do too.
 
Having gone through the system recently, I find it quite clear once you document yourself and understand the grading. Application to the CAO is straight forward. While really stressful if you are aiming for a challenging goal, what you need to achieve in terms of mark is relatively clear (though the post mark adjustments since covid muddle things). I believe the integrity of the leaving certificate is at risk with the multiplication of projects which would inevitably favor the students with the most resources. Currently students can access grinds, private education and receive help. However at the end of the day they are alone in front of their exam papers. They don't improve their knowledge by osmosis and have to put some kind of work to be able to get a high mark.
 
And, to be fair, it's not supposed to do that. It's supposed to ensure that places on courses are allocated equitably, and it does that very well.
 
That's not corrupt (except for the appointment of the children of friends).

Corruption has a meaning. The fight against corruption is really not helped at all if every example of poor management, poor judgement or poor behaviour is labelled "corrupt".
 
TomEdison said:
And, to be fair, it's not supposed to do that. It's supposed to ensure that places on courses are allocated equitably, and it does that very well.
Click to expand...
They're always clear on saying to rank your choices by order of preference and that precious points aren't an indicator, but the whole LC culture has loads of people taking last years points into consideration for their choices and what they need to achieve on the exams.
 
Dr Strangelove said:
I mean that’s completely logical.
Click to expand...
It's logical in that there's no alternative, but it depends on the popularity of the course and the calibre of students on that one year who applied for it. If the points for a course one year are 600, might that put off people the next year or perhaps the number of places is expanded, or maybe there's a negative change in perception of that course in the meantime. I'm sure it's been said somewhere before, but last performance is not a reliable guide to future performance.
 
TomEdison said:
That's not corrupt (except for the appointment of the children of friends).
Click to expand...
Corrupt can be defined in several ways, including being dishonest and acting without integrity.
TomEdison said:
The fight against corruption is really not helped at all if every example of poor management, poor judgement or poor behaviour is labelled "corrupt".
Click to expand...
I was using an example to illustrate that not all occupiers of high office necessarily act with integrity. I wasn’t seeking to join the wider fight against corruption generally.
 
Dr Strangelove said:
I mean that’s completely logical.
Click to expand...

I think Dr Strangelove was being sarcastic.

If your little heart is set on doing Very Prestigious Course In Very Prestigious University, if you would take an offer of a place on that course over any other offer, then put it as your no. 1 choice. You lose nothing at all by having More Realistically Obtainable Course as only your second choice — if you get the points for your second choice course you will get an offer for it; you will not be penalised for having it as your second choice rather than your first.

The only circumstance in which you wouldn't be offered a place on your second choice course is if you were offered a place on your first choice course.
 
Fortune said:
but last performance is not a reliable guide to future performance.
Click to expand...
Last year’s CAO points are an extremely reliable predictor of this year’s. It’s one of the most reliable things out there TBH!

In any case it’s a bit moot. A candidate can do better than rank courses in order of preference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register