Re: Can Ireland survive climate change?
I think that the man-made aspect of climate change is vastly over-rated. Climate change is an established part of our history and the last millenium has seen the extremes of the 17th century "mini ice age" and the south east of England being warm enough to be regarded as a leading wine producing region (c 1100AD) Further back in history, during the real ice age, the sea level dropped enough to create landbridges between Ireland and Britain, Britain and mainland Europe, Alaska and Asia etc. All this happened without human intervention and shows that nature itself is more than capable of producing massive climate change. What is less sure is that the actions of man are capable of producing climate change. While the earth is undoubtedly getting warmer, should we be quicker to attribute this to the proven ability of nature to vary our climate or the unproven theory that an increase in so-called "greenhouse gases" is doing the business? Lets face it, relatively little is understood of the theory of climate to the extent that no universally agreed model has been produced that can produce reliable, testable predictions of future climate. So we are left with opinions. The carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere has risen steadily over tha last 150 years. Simultaneously, the Earth's climate has got a degree or so warmer. Put two and two together and you can get, well, anything you like, really. How do you extrapolate the relationship? Is there, in fact, any causal relationship? We don't know. Nobody knows. It's all guesswork. In fact, I remember in the 1970's, some scientists were warning of an imminent ice age due to "global dimming" -clouds of industrial pollutants reducing the energy arriving from the sun - this reduction had actually been measured. Now we are being warned of global warming - perhaps by the same scientists.
Any theory of climate must start with the fact that the main engine of weather activity on the Earth is the energy arriving from the sun. And we know that solar activity and hence thermal output is not a constant. And, in fact, other observed stars show even greater variation in luminosity and thermal output. It seems reasonable to me to conclude that solar variation is a far more determinative source of climate change than anything our relatively puny efforts can accomplish.