Can I leave an airport during long connection period?
- Thread starter Salvadore
- Start date
I fly Dublin-India frequently.
Etihad/Qatar etc used to provide great service. They have lost the shine a little bit lately but they are still pretty good, especially compared to alternatives. Airport and facilities you can't do better than Dubai / Abu Dhabi etc. They are really showcasing their wealth there and compared to them Dublin is like public bus station rest room (Dublin is pretty poor compared to most airports anyway, even many Indian airports are way better than Dublin, but that's a different story altogether).
Middle East based airlines will also offer a free stop-over option, for example, (can not post links www etihad com/en-ie/abu-dhabi/stopover), This will cover your accommodation for a night or two, but be aware that there are loads of terms and conditions (ticket has to be more than $1000 etc etc).
I personally found Istanbul airport too busy and chaotic. For some reason, at the departure gate, they had another police / security person patting down everyone, opening and checking the contents of hand luggage, and strangely they asked for a second ID other than passport (luckily I had a driving license with me). I would also always try and avoid Heathrow as well.
Etihad/Qatar etc used to provide great service. They have lost the shine a little bit lately but they are still pretty good, especially compared to alternatives. Airport and facilities you can't do better than Dubai / Abu Dhabi etc. They are really showcasing their wealth there and compared to them Dublin is like public bus station rest room (Dublin is pretty poor compared to most airports anyway, even many Indian airports are way better than Dublin, but that's a different story altogether).
Middle East based airlines will also offer a free stop-over option, for example, (can not post links www etihad com/en-ie/abu-dhabi/stopover), This will cover your accommodation for a night or two, but be aware that there are loads of terms and conditions (ticket has to be more than $1000 etc etc).
I personally found Istanbul airport too busy and chaotic. For some reason, at the departure gate, they had another police / security person patting down everyone, opening and checking the contents of hand luggage, and strangely they asked for a second ID other than passport (luckily I had a driving license with me). I would also always try and avoid Heathrow as well.
redchariot
Registered User
- Messages
- 595
To be honest, once you reach the UAE, it is only about another 4 hours or so to India so I would soldier on with a short transfer. I myself, am happy with a couple of hours in the middle east before getting on the next flight no matter what the length even if going to somewhere like Australia; I just prefer to get the flight done.
The only time I consider a long transfer is where the flights would be much cheaper; for example I saved about €300 by taking an 8 hour transfer in Doha once instead of 2 hours and I took a tour from the airport which was great, got to see a bit of Qatar.
The only time I consider a long transfer is where the flights would be much cheaper; for example I saved about €300 by taking an 8 hour transfer in Doha once instead of 2 hours and I took a tour from the airport which was great, got to see a bit of Qatar.
Gordon Gekko
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,842
This is a joke, right?
Turkey wasn’t exactly utopia for women and women’s rights, and it’s deteriorated since Erdogan took office.
clinteastwood
Registered User
- Messages
- 254
clinteastwood
Registered User
- Messages
- 254
Correct, but is a Utopia if you are a woman from UAE, Saudi and *.stan places. Agreed it's not Icelandic.
UAE etc are built on slavery and oppression, utterly appalling places. They are way worse than Apartheid era South Africa. I would never go there or support their economies. People who go there to work are worse than those who supported Apartheid. They are supporting and financially benefitting from slavery and the oppression of women.
Gordon Gekko
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,842
Apartheid was far worse.
Really? Are you sure?
Have you read any of the reports about how women and minorities and their slaves, sorry, those there under the kafala system are treated?
Or what about the actual slaves? The population of UAE is 10 million but they have an additional 8 million migrants who have no real rights.
You think Apartheid was far worse?
Gordon Gekko
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,842
Spare us the hyperbole. Employee rights mightn’t be at Irish levels in the UAE but talk of slavery and comparisons with Apartheid are frankly ridiculous.
It's not hyperbole, it's hard fact. You mightn't like that but that doesn't change the reality.
Anyone who lived there and avails of their tax free status should realise that they can do so only because it's a slave economy. All those teachers and nurses and engineers and everyone else is participating in, profiting from and enabling slavery. If they are comfortable doing so that's fine but they should know what that makes then and that they have no business lecturing anyone else about moral standards or right and wrong. Ever.
I wouldn't consider myself knowledgeable on the matter but the Truth Commission in SA reported 21,00 deaths between 1948 and 1994. Estimates out the death toll of foreign migrant workers around 10,000 per annum in UAE!
Gordon Gekko
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,842
I really don’t think that’s a valid comparison. 21,000 citizens effectively murdered by an oppressive government vs 10,000 workers dying per year in health and safety incidents.
And that 10,000 stat isn’t just the UAE, it’s in all of the Gulf Co-Op States combined, so the UAE, Saudi, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, and Kuwait.
“Health and safety isn’t great on building sites” is hardly comparable with Apartheid.
Gordon Gekko
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,842
Poor health and safety standards on building sites being equated with Apartheid. Talk about jumping the shark.