Early Riser
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,643
your guess re my salary / DOB are correct.
"your salary is in region of €36 K ?
"Is your date of birth June 1953 ?"
If so, it suggests that The Occupational Pension estimate that obtained from your employer last year was broadly correct, provided that
- The totting up of your service record was correct - but you have probably checked this.
- They were allocating the correct number of years of notional service. I am having a little difficulty getting my mind around this. You were born in June 1953 so in August 2015 you were aged 62 years and 2 months. That left 2 years and 10 months until your 65th birthday. Yet the estimate suggests 3 years and 10 months (approx). This suggests that they are allowing you up until the end of your 65th year. Is this the correct procedure - I simply don't know but I would be curious if someone could enlighten ? Alternatively it is a mistake.
Anyway, onto your substantial point. I am sorry to hear about your eye disease and I regret that I can offer no advice on the procedure for IHR. Hopefully others can help.
Best of luck with it all.
There are some differences alright in terms of what the pension modeller gives me for my occupational pension part compared to what Early Riser calculated but remember that all of Early Risers calculations are based on the fact that I am retiring at 60 having completed 30 years of service.
Hello again Japester - And no doubt my calculations are incorrect ! I would be interested in exploring this further, purely as a learning exercise, if you are interested ? Here is how I reached my figures using the modeller.
Assumptions
DOB 1/2/1957
Projected retirement date : 1/2/2017
Salary €70000
Service to date 29 years 18 days
Projected service to retirement 350 days
(Total Approx 30 years)
Result using the post 95 Class A Modeller
Occupational Pension €17124
Gratuity €78772
Supplementary Pension
Running the same figure through the pre-95 Class D modeller gave the same estimate for gratuity and an Occupational Pension estimate of €26257.
My understanding is that the Supplementary Pension is the difference between 26257 and 17124, ie €9133.
This Supplementary amount would bring you up to the same level as the Class D person. (Of course this Supplementary is only payable if you meet the other conditions applied post 95, eg not in gainful employment, not eligible for, or obtaining, Social Welfare such as Jobseekers, Illness/Disability, State Old Age pension) . If you were obtaining any of these benefits simultaneously you would obviously be greatly advantaged over the Class D person. The Class A person can be somewhat advantaged though, ie, if the level of Social Welfare payable in this instance were to be greater than €9133. Does this compensate for the restriction of not being able to work while obtaining the Supplementary ? I guess this depends on each person's own circumstance.
Anyway, as regards your own estimate, which is different, I would be interested (if you have time) in learning how you went about it and what results you reached. As I say, I am probably getting it wrong and would be interested in figuring it out.
.
Hi ppmmeath, it looks like we differ on our interpretation of the "yearly average" here!! You are saying that it means the person must have a yearly average of at least 10 full-rate contribs in order to qualify for the minimum State Pension (Contrib) of €93.20 but that the person must have made at least 10 contributions each and every year since they first made a contribution in order to be eligible for this?
It does look like we differ Japster, my reading of the highlighted section above is that from the year you start working and paying a PRSI stamp, in this case 1953, that you need a yearly average of at least 10 stamps to the end of your contribution year before you reach 66.
- a yearly average of at least 10 paid and/or credited full rate contributions from 1953 (or the year you started insurable employment, if later) to the end of the contribution year before you reach age 66.
Furthermore, it is also how I am interpreting the "normal average rule" which came to light in Meath Lady's situation, we even with her 10 years of contributions, (520), she may not be eligible.
"Normal average rule
The normal average rule states that you must have a yearly average of at least 10 appropriate contributions paid or credited from the year you first entered insurance or from 1953, whichever is later to the end of the tax year before you reach pension age (66). An average of 10 entitles you to a minimum pension; you need an average of 48 to get the maximum pension."
For example, for gross weekly earnings of €377:
This is the minimum wage, but think about this for a moment.
- One-sixth of your earnings over €352.01 is €377- €352.01 = €24.99, divided by 6 = €4.17.
- Subtract this from the maximum credit of €12, giving you a credit of €7.83.
- The basic PRSI charge is 4% of €377 = €15.08.
- You will pay €7.25 PRSI weekly in 2016 (€15.08 minus your €7.83 PRSI credit).
Someone 50k would pay (guesstimate) €30 a week?
€30/10/45 = 13,500 over your entire working life. This gets you your unemployment, your illness, maternity leave, medical card and a minimum pension of almost 5,000 a year for the rest of your life.
PRSI is an "insurance" policy, if you pay into it, then you are eligible for the benefits that you pay into, if you stop paying for a period of time, then if anything happens to you, then you can't go back and try to claim off the policy that you stopped paying into.
You need the minimum yearly payments, to keep you in insurance.
We don't close enough to fund the SW pensions bill as it is.
Sure that would then mean no-one would be eligible for the State Pension (Contrib) unless they ensured they had made at least 10 contribs each and every single year since they first started working - how many people would really be in this boat?
Flip that around, if every single person only needed to make 10 contributions over a 20 year period at a cost of 13,500 over 45 years and receive all those benefits - we are in a bad way now, but this would be total bankruptcy - this is why the PS pension model had to change in 1995.
To me it just doesn't make sense at all that someone who contributed for a full 20 years (1040 contribs) will not get any State Pension (contrib) while someone say who made only a handful of contributions, say on average 13, every year for 45 years (585 contributions) would then be entitled to €93.20 - that surely cannot be correct? Maybe there is someone reading this that has experience of what we are talking about and can enlighten us further.
It sounds a lot in years, but it is your working life and we all (most of us) work and pay our taxes throughout our lives, it isn't a lot financially.
"In my view this person has definitely "contributed" to the system - he did so over a 20 year period when he worked! I do see the gaping hole in his contributions alright but surely the 20 years he has contributed must mean he has to be entitled to a percentage of the full State Pension (Contrib) - €198.60/week by my own calculations earlier.
So, your view is that his 20 years of 52 stamps - 1040 entitle him to all those benefits and that he can then apply and be entitled for a pension of over €10,000 a year from 60 until the day he dies?
I haven't had time to do the calculations for a PRSI contribution as above - but if someone on the minimum wage pays €7 per week, then even if this worker was paying 7 times that = €50 a week, then to avail of this very, very, very generous entitlement he would, over 20 years pay:
€52,000
If he lives until he is 70 he will have received 100,000 euro in pension payments alone.
I just cannot fathom that his 20 years would be worth nothing in terms of getting State Pension (Contrib) just because he failed to make any further PRSI contribs up to retirement age."
I certainly can to be honest.
Does that mean, were I to take retirement at 55 and leave off my own steam for 5 years until I reach 60 that I would then not be entitled to State Pension (Contrib) because I never made any contributions between 55 and 60? It sounds bonkers if it were true!
You have to calculate your entitlements using the formula.
If you first entered the workforce at age 20 (for example) and entered both the PS (insurable employment), and worked for 25 years leaving the workforce, taking early retirement, then we are moving onto another issue - preserved benefits, so I have absolutely no idea.
That is something that you would really have to take to your employer and ask them do they take into account the full rate of OAP (and your eligibility is determined by your PRSI position, then you would have to ask the SW if you would be in benefit at 60).
But here's the thing, if you just left then you would be entitled to JSB for two years (this is what keeps you insured) or you could buy the PRSI if you were short.
Hi Early Riser, my apologies to you as the figures you reached through the pension modeller are exactly tha same as what I get for 30 years service, bar a few shillings. So you have absolutely done nothing wrong in using the modeller! It looks to me that I will get that occupational pension on reaching 60 and (according to the website for the Dept of Education who have their own pension modeller at ) also receive the supplementary pension that you specify above from 60-68. Then once I reach 68, supplementary will cease as I will (hopefully) be entitled to receive the full rate of COAP at that point and, like you say, maybe gain a few bob on the supplmentary pension. As ppmmeath says, and I believe you also mentioned it before, I will need to ensure that my PRSI contributions continue should I decide to perhaps leave a little earlier than 60 so that I have the "yearly average" bit sorted for full COAP!
Japester - As our calculations coincide, hopefully it means that we are both on the right path, rather than a a folie a deux !
Just one other point,though. Leaving at 60 would not necessarily mean that you would qualify for the full rate of COAP at 68. You would still need to meet the qualifying conditions, currently an average yearly rate of 48 contributions, as you have pointed out. You might need to consider signing for credits beyond 60, depending on your contribution history and whatever the qualifying conditions are at that stage. Of course the next lower COAP rate currently in operation is only marginally lower and you may consider you can live with the difference. At any event under current Pension Scheme rules, you would still be required to apply for Jobseekers (or other SW benefit if it should be relevant to you) when you retire at 60.
allencat3 said: ↑
your guess re my salary / DOB are correct.
Click to expand...
Hi Allencat3. Do you mean this guess ?
↑
"your salary is in region of €36 K ?
"Is your date of birth June 1953 ?"
EasyRider - sorry, I got the names mixed up after scrolling up/down so many posts. Yes, my DOB is June 1953 and salary 35K.
Thanks to you, ppmeath, japesters, et al for the posts re ER, COAP, IHR, etc. - quite overwhelming but worthwhile studying in order to inform myself making the decision during this year.
Kind regards,
allencat3
Hello Allencat 3
I just noticed that I made a small error in my original calculation of your service days in POST 131 (I had you returning from ICB on 15/3/2013 rather than 15/4/2013. Just to let you know that I have just edited POST131 to reflect the revised figures. There is actually very little change in the Pension calculation as a result.
Just to note again that the pension figures are calculated on service up to age 65 - This reflects the understanding that you will be granted notional years to that age under IHR. I understand that you actually intend to retire before that.
Firstly, the "retired public sector people who are in this scenario", do not exist - they could not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?