Japster, yes you are right - no matter which way you calculate it, you would be entitled to the same payment.
Where Early Riser and I differ is on what you have to do at 60 to avail of that entitlement.
I am coming from the point of your "entitlement" and that entitlement is a DB scheme which entitles you to 40/80ths of your salary which is made up of an Occupational Pension and a State pension.
According to the pension authority a DB pension is:
"Public sector defined benefit schemes are occupational pension schemes that provide a set level of pension at retirement, the amount of which normally depends on your service and your earnings at retirement or in the years immediately preceding retirement.
For public servants who joined prior to 6th April 1995, a pension of 1/80th of final earnings is payable for each year of service. A gratuity (cash sum) of 3/80ths of final earnings is also payable."
For public servants who joined on or after 6th April 1995, pensions are coordinated with the State pension.
This is known as "integration" in the private sector and "coordination" in the public sector.
An integrated scheme looks at the State pension as part of the total pension package promised to employees on retirement. One reason for this is that both employers and employees make PRSI contributions and these, in turn, entitle scheme members to Social Welfare benefits, including State pension. "
So, as you can see, your pension promise is 50% of your salary. So from where I am coming from that is your starting point.
According to the link:
"Example Pension promise: 40/80ths Actual salary: €45,000
State pension offset: (2.0 x €12,000) = €24,000 Pensionable salary: (€45,000 - €24,000) = €21,000
Scheme pension: 40/80ths x €21,000 = €10,500
State pension: €12,000
Total pension: €12,000 + €10,500 = €22,500 (40/80ths of €45,000)
In this case, the State pension of €12,000 provides the required pension of 50% of the first €24,000 of salary. The employer’s pension scheme will then provide the balance based on the salary in excess of this amount."
------------------
In your case it would be 40/80th of actual salary: €70,000
State pension offset x 2 = €24,000 pensionable salary: (€70,000 - €24,000) = €46,000
Scheme pension: 40/80th x €46,000 =€23,000
State pension: €12,000 + €23,000 = €35,000 (40/80ths of €70,000)
-------------------
Now that is according to the pensions authority. If your "promise" when you joined was 50% of your salary on retirement with full service and full PRSI entitlement, then this is what you are entitled to.
It would be absolutely grossly unfair if, because of how the model changed after 1995, you had to sign on for 9 months and then apply for a supplementary pension to age 68 - to receive the very same pension as your pre 1995 counterpart received at 60.
Remember that he didn't pay a Class A stamp and you did.
So all your 1995 counterpart had to do was work his 40 years.
Remember that you are supposed to be "equal" to a pre 1995 and receive the same pension as if it was calculated the way his/her pension was calculated.
You have to work 40 years, pay 40 years PRSI contributions yet on retirement you have to make yourself available for work (Sign on for JSB) for 9 months, then apply for a supplementary pension until you are 68?
All to receive the same pension that your pre 1995 counterpart got on retirement at 40 years?
Under no circumstances could this be considered "fair and equal" treatment, I am sorry, but it just flies in the face of logic.
What you outlined here makes absolute sense of course and I'd hope that is the way things would proceed when my time comes. It would be much more straightforward than having to go to the trouble of signing on for JSB for 9 months and then having to apply for a supplementary pension. Fingers crossed anyway! I guess we'll find out what the story is in due course as more and more class A post 95ers avail of retirement between 60 and OAP age.