OK, so just to make sure I understand you correctly - you are concluding that any able-bodied person in council housing for more than 12 months is not rational - right?
Just curious - do you know many people who live in council housing?
What is the difference between 'unable to work on medical grounds' and 'on the sick'? What specifically do you mean by 'on the sick'?
Originally Posted by Complainer http://www.askaboutmoney.com/showthread.php?p=1155786#post1155786
What is the difference between 'unable to work on medical grounds' and 'on the sick'? What specifically do you mean by 'on the sick'?
I know someone who is from one of the well known 'deprived' areas - she worked her way out and has a good job. However, she has a close relative who is 'on the sick'. This fellow has diabetes. The day he was diagnosed, the entire family went out celebrating as the diagnosis qualified him to go on the sick, so he would never need to look for work again and will get whatever benefits/housing he needs. His sympthoms are no worse than those of the thousands of diabetics who work in this country - he's no complications or real limitations and is physically active.
Anecdotal evidence...tut tut...don't you know that'll be thrown out of court
I know someone who is from one of the well known 'deprived' areas - she worked her way out and has a good job. However, she has a close relative who is 'on the sick'. This fellow has diabetes. The day he was diagnosed, the entire family went out celebrating as the diagnosis qualified him to go on the sick, so he would never need to look for work again and will get whatever benefits/housing he needs. His sympthoms are no worse than those of the thousands of diabetics who work in this country - he's no complications or real limitations and is physically active.
So why do you think that anyone ends up in long term social housing?Thats not what I understood from it - I understood it to mean any able bodied person living in atrocious conditions in council housing should be able to get the shoulder to the wheel and better their lot.
It may seem strange to you, but some people are prepared to work to improve the conditions of their whole community, rather than just looking after their own back.The community spirit comment is rubbish - are you seriously saying that people would prefer to endanger their children in the name of community spirit?
So why do you think that anyone ends up in long term social housing?
It may seem strange to you, but some people are prepared to work to improve the conditions of their whole community, rather than just looking after their own back.
Its not just their own backs though is it? Its their kids backs. You think its ok to try to improve the conditions of the whole community and in doing so put your own health and your childrens health at risk? To me thats just irresponsible, stupid and misguided.
.
Dolphin House
It's called community spirit.
Here's one (of several) possible scenarios. You don't believe it is likely that someone can freeze to death in Dublin today. You prioritise your kids safety, but you are concerned about risks to your few remaining bits of property if you leave your premises unattended. You can't afford a portable heater, and you're in arrears on your ESB bill. You hope that tomorrow will bring something better. As the hypothermia becomes more severe, your thinking becomes more sluggish (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothermia#Severe) and you do not respond in a rational way. You might do a bit of Paradoxical undressing, which makes things worse. You die in your sleep.
I believe she was the last person left in that tower, which is why the heating had been turned off. We'll probably hear more about this case today, as it goes back to the Coroner's Court.How come other people didn't die in the flats if conditions were so severe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?