Leesider32
Registered User
- Messages
- 192
Recently I used Hertz car rental in the UK. I knew they were going to fine me because by mistake I drove down a one-way street for 100 metres but they never gave me the opportunity to appeal it. So rather than deal with them I wanted my bank to block any future transactions from them so then they would have to deal with me............makes for a better conversation if they don't have your money already!
I rang my bank and asked them to block any future transactions from the company which they confirmed was now in place, however the payment still came out. I rang my bank again and they agreed they should have blocked the merchant so they refunded the amount back into my account. One month later the money was taken out of my account again and I received a letter from my bank to say that "the merchant has declined our dispute request".
Am I correct in saying that if the bank had put the block on the merchant in the first place, as I had requested, then the money would never have been taken out in the and there would have been no need for the bank to raise a dispute request? In other words Hertz would have had to deal directly with me to get their money?
It appears to me that the bank made a mistake by not putting the block on but of course they don't want to lose out so they raise a dispute request and then acted as judge and jury when the merchant sent them some information and took the money back out of my account.
I rang my bank and asked them to block any future transactions from the company which they confirmed was now in place, however the payment still came out. I rang my bank again and they agreed they should have blocked the merchant so they refunded the amount back into my account. One month later the money was taken out of my account again and I received a letter from my bank to say that "the merchant has declined our dispute request".
Am I correct in saying that if the bank had put the block on the merchant in the first place, as I had requested, then the money would never have been taken out in the and there would have been no need for the bank to raise a dispute request? In other words Hertz would have had to deal directly with me to get their money?
It appears to me that the bank made a mistake by not putting the block on but of course they don't want to lose out so they raise a dispute request and then acted as judge and jury when the merchant sent them some information and took the money back out of my account.