M
Meccano
Guest
I'm surprised at this discussions implications.
Last year I read a thread on this BB which implied that declaring 'the contents' of a home as separate from the dutiable sale price was perfectly legitimate (within reason). Now the concensus seems to be that it is underhand and illegal??
I'm currently buying a house. I've informed my solicitor that 5K is to be considered as the price of the contents. He asked me to get the EA to send him a valuation for that ammount - which has duly been done.
Its my understanding that the GOODS which constitute the CONTENTS of the house being purchased are NOT considered dutiable (Stamp Duty).
Therefore - whats the problem with doing this? The Revenue are already getting over 46K from me in Duty, I doubt they'll bring down the whole deal over a 350euro saving to me.
Last year I read a thread on this BB which implied that declaring 'the contents' of a home as separate from the dutiable sale price was perfectly legitimate (within reason). Now the concensus seems to be that it is underhand and illegal??
I'm currently buying a house. I've informed my solicitor that 5K is to be considered as the price of the contents. He asked me to get the EA to send him a valuation for that ammount - which has duly been done.
Its my understanding that the GOODS which constitute the CONTENTS of the house being purchased are NOT considered dutiable (Stamp Duty).
Therefore - whats the problem with doing this? The Revenue are already getting over 46K from me in Duty, I doubt they'll bring down the whole deal over a 350euro saving to me.